• 39 Posts
  • 691 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle



  • Bazzite isn’t just modified Fedora, it’s based on Fedora Atomics, like Silverblue and Kinoite. If OP isn’t even sure about which distro to use, tossing them into the world of ostree might be a little much, since a lot of the online advice doesn’t take immutable systems into account. The Discord community they have is helpful, though, and there’s more than a few users here on Lemmy who use it, who I’m sure would be willing to help.

    Nobara is just modified Fedora, however, and it’s also nice.



  • I couldn’t say on the updates for Mint, as I use CachyOS, but I know that lots of people love and recommend it, in part because the opinionated changes it makes almost always have the end user in mind.

    I do have experience with Bazzite (a sibling to Aurora), and worrying about updates is virtually zero. That’s because of how the updates actually happen. You’re not modifying the system directly, you’re creating a new image based on an upstream version that was built and tested each time.

    The idea is that you have a “master copy” that can be deployed at scale and has some level of guarantee to work. If it doesn’t, you rollback. No downtime, since you should theoretically always have an image that works, even if it’s not up to date.

    Whatever you choose, something with KDE Plasma or Cinnamon as the DE would feel the most like Windows.


  • Ubuntu would not be my first choice.

    If he can get most of his programs via Flatpak or AppImage, and he doesn’t intend to do a lot of tinkering via command line, check out Aurora. The Fedora Atomic distros and the UBlue derivatives are great “set it and forget it” options, and I believe Aurora has automatic updates set up out of the box.

    The best part is that if something gets fucked up by an update, you can just rollback to a previous state in GRUB.

    Using distrobox, he could even set up an Ubuntu container to install anything that’s only available in the Ubuntu repos (and I recommend the companion app Box Buddy).

    The one downside is that any tinkering will require learning a new paradigm, since most of the system is immutable, except for /etc and /var, which is where the user’s /home directory is (i.e. /var/home).

    If all of that sounds too daunting, or you want a more traditional distro experience, install Mint and call it a day. Good luck!






  • I’m also neurodivergent. This is not neurodivergence on display, this is a person who has mentally diverged from reality. It’s word salad.

    I appreciate your perspective on recursion, though I think your philosophical generosity is misplaced. Just look at the following sentence he spoke:

    And if you’re recursive, the non-governmental system isolates you, mirrors you, and replaces you.

    This sentence explicitly states that some people can be recursive, and it implies that some people cannot be recursive. But people are not recursive at all. Their thinking might be, as you pointed out; intangible concepts might be recursive, but tangible things themselves are not recursive—they simply are what they are. It’s the same as saying an orange is recursive, or a melody is recursive. It’s nonsense.

    And what’s that last bit about being isolated, mirrored, and replaced? It’s anyone’s guess, and it sounds an awful lot like someone with paranoid delusions about secret organizations pulling unseen strings from the shadows.

    I think it’s good you have a generous spirit, but I think you’re just casting your pearls before swine, in this case.



  • I’m a developer, and this is 100% word salad.

    “It doesn’t suppress content,” he continues. “It suppresses recursion. If you don’t know what recursion means, you’re in the majority. I didn’t either until I started my walk. And if you’re recursive, the non-governmental system isolates you, mirrors you, and replaces you. …”

    This is actual nonsense. Recursion has to do with algorithms, and it’s when you call a function from within itself.

    def func_a(input=True):
      if input is True:
        func_a(True)
      else:
        return False
    

    My program above would recur infinitely, but hopefully you can get the gist.

    Anyway, it sounds like he’s talking about people, not algorithms. People can’t recur. We aren’t “recursive,” so whatever he thinks he means, it isn’t based in reality. That plus the nebulous talk of being replaced by some unseen entity reek of paranoid delusions.

    I’m not saying that is what he has, but it sure does have a similar appearance, and if he is in his right mind (doubt it), he doesn’t have any clue what he’s talking about.