fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoTRUE AND REALlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1379arrow-down17
arrow-up1372arrow-down1imageTRUE AND REALlemmy.dbzer0.comfossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 hours agoYeah it’s outside my expertise so I’m bad at the detail. Normal process is the nice efficient anaerobic process that produces ATP from glucose Cancers use an all aerobic process which is less efficient but faster at producing ATP
minus-squareflora_explora@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·25 minutes agoYou still got it mixed up a bit though. There is no “normal” respiration, cells use both types of respiration all the time. current estimates [of the yield in aerobic respiration] range around 29 to 30 ATP per glucose. Aerobic metabolism is up to 15 times more efficient than anaerobic metabolism (which yields 2 molecules of ATP per 1 molecule of glucose). Anoxic regeneration of NAD+ is only an effective means of energy production during short, intense exercise in vertebrates, for a period ranging from 10 seconds to 2 minutes during a maximal effort in humans. (At lower exercise intensities it can sustain muscle activity in diving animals, such as seals, whales and other aquatic vertebrates, for very much longer periods of time.) Maybe you could link an article or a study where you’ve hear about this cancer connection? Would be curious what’s behind it.
Yeah it’s outside my expertise so I’m bad at the detail.
Normal process is the nice efficient anaerobic process that produces ATP from glucose
Cancers use an all aerobic process which is less efficient but faster at producing ATP
You still got it mixed up a bit though. There is no “normal” respiration, cells use both types of respiration all the time.
Maybe you could link an article or a study where you’ve hear about this cancer connection? Would be curious what’s behind it.