• MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Maybe with a supercapacitor in the station and a chrging cable with the diameter of a fuel hose.

    • Rob1992@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not really, just make the vehicle 800v and then use the same Amp limits. That’s where everyone is out pacing tesla now. Tesla went for amps, the others went for volts

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Energy is amp x volt. Same energy faster is more energy in same time, be it amps or volt. Dunno if your grid can bear it multiple times in each city but still better buffer it. And more volts needs more gum or you get the volts.

    • minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I always imagined that portable future wizard (??nuclear??) power would be as simple as unscrewing a 5 gallon cannister from the back of a vehicle and exchanging it at the power/charging station for money. Like the small 20 lb LPG cooking gas tanks. I still think that electric cars are a phase of tech that cannot be sustainable in terms of money and environmental cost and waste for too long and that it is just transitional in our quest. Hydrogen power was always supposed to be the future in my mind.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Hydrogen has the same problems tho. Well, except metal/bor hydride, but they have low enery density.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Assuming this is about the same thing as the other BYD charging article I saw a couple days ago, they’re using a higher voltage, which would let them charge faster without needing a thicker* cable.

      (* The copper need not be thicker, but the insulation might need to be)

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The copper need not be thicker, but the insulation might need to be

        Exactly. More energy means either more copper or more rubber in the cable.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Rubber is cheap though, and flexible. If it’s the size of a gas pump hose, oh well; gas pump hoses are also rubber. As long as they don’t have to make the copper ridiculously thick, it shouldn’t matter how thick the cable overall is