I have, it didn’t provide any of the evidence you claim, hence why you can’t actually point to any.
Look into Roger Stone & Donald Trump mentored by Roy Cohn
I have, it didn’t provide any of the evidence you claim, hence why you can’t actually point to any.
The guy you’re trying to accuse me of?
“I can’t be doing McCarthism because Roy Cohn was McCarthy’s guy!” Incoherent reasoning.
And instead of reading ANY articles you wanna argue.
I’ve read them, and they don’t contain what you say. Hence why you can’t actually back up your point and are reduced to endlessly acting like a looping bot.
This person has not read the Mueller report, which basically says “If we had the power to charge the president with a crime, we would, but we don’t, so we’re referring this to the attorney general since that is his job”
And then Bill Barr farted on it and trump bragged about being exonerated.
I read the comments. Very aware, but thanks for adding it here.
BIAB isn’t my target audience. It takes a lot of rubles to buy that kind of stupidity, and I just don’t have a piggy bank that can compete with Uncle Vlad’s. My targets are the people who might read that slop and go “maybe this guy is right”.
Can you provide evidence of me being intolerant of evidence so I can see if I’m actually intolerant of evidence? Or are you just making shit up and hoping that no one actually checks?
I have, it didn’t provide any of the evidence you claim, hence why you can’t actually point to any.
When you obviously haven’t, and then when I pointed out what the Mueller report actually said about the president’s criminal behavior, your response was…
Please cite the part of the Mueller report that backs up the claim of a “Russian Intelligence Operation That Hooked Musk And Thiel”
I pointed out that what you wanted evidence for was not something that was specifically asserted in the thread, so you then linked a comment from a different thread, which didn’t even back up your point to begin with, it was just another comment saying that you should read the Mueller report.
And you think I’m the one that is intolerant to evidence?
When you obviously haven’t, and then when I pointed out what the Mueller report actually said about the president’s criminal behavior, your reaponse was…
This was not about the president. This was about the actual topic of the post.
I pointed out that what you wanted evidence for was not something that was specifically asserted in the thread
Actually it was.
And you think I’m the one that is intolerant to evidence?
Yes, given that you are deliberately straw-manning me to attack me asking for evidence.
PSA, @InternetCitizen2 is a self admitted troll who has been stalking me accross the fediverse making accusations he can’t back up because he’s angry I said genocide denial is bad.
Your entire comment history is trolling. Or are you really that bad faith of a commenter? You goals seem to want to suppress pragmatic support for Palestine; which is something a genocider would want.
I have, it didn’t provide any of the evidence you claim, hence why you can’t actually point to any.
I have, it didn’t provide any of the evidence you claim, hence why you can’t actually point to any.
“I can’t be doing McCarthism because Roy Cohn was McCarthy’s guy!” Incoherent reasoning.
I’ve read them, and they don’t contain what you say. Hence why you can’t actually back up your point and are reduced to endlessly acting like a looping bot.
Please point to any disinformation I’ve posted.
“You lose”
This person has not read the Mueller report, which basically says “If we had the power to charge the president with a crime, we would, but we don’t, so we’re referring this to the attorney general since that is his job”
And then Bill Barr farted on it and trump bragged about being exonerated.
PSA @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml is a troll.
I read the comments. Very aware, but thanks for adding it here.
BIAB isn’t my target audience. It takes a lot of rubles to buy that kind of stupidity, and I just don’t have a piggy bank that can compete with Uncle Vlad’s. My targets are the people who might read that slop and go “maybe this guy is right”.
Doing the Lords work.
Damn, you really can’t tolerate someone asking for evidence can you?
Can you provide evidence of me being intolerant of evidence so I can see if I’m actually intolerant of evidence? Or are you just making shit up and hoping that no one actually checks?
Sure. This comment where you called me a troll, stupid, a Russian shill, and my comments slop, all for the crime of asking for evidence
So let me get this straight.
You claimed you read the Mueller report.
When you obviously haven’t, and then when I pointed out what the Mueller report actually said about the president’s criminal behavior, your response was…
I pointed out that what you wanted evidence for was not something that was specifically asserted in the thread, so you then linked a comment from a different thread, which didn’t even back up your point to begin with, it was just another comment saying that you should read the Mueller report.
And you think I’m the one that is intolerant to evidence?
This was not about the president. This was about the actual topic of the post.
Actually it was.
Yes, given that you are deliberately straw-manning me to attack me asking for evidence.
PSA, @InternetCitizen2 is a self admitted troll who has been stalking me accross the fediverse making accusations he can’t back up because he’s angry I said genocide denial is bad.
Who?
The person you just replied to?
Where?
https://lemmy.ml/post/30295673/18706282
Oh, you stilly goose, that was minutes ago. I just replied to you actually.
Please cite the part of the Mueller report that backs up the claim of a “Russian Intelligence Operation That Hooked Musk And Thiel”
Feel free to quote where that was an assertion that was made in this thread.
OK
That’s not part of this thread. Feel free to try again.
https://lemmy.ml/post/30295673/18697852
That’s a nice link. Still missing the assertion that the Mueller report had anything to say about Musk or Thiel.
Woudl you like to try again, or just fade away and save a little face?
Nope. It’s there. If you’re going to deliberately play dumb because you can’t handle people asking for evidence, there’s nothing I can do about it.
Piss off disinformation moron
Where have I posted misinformation?
It is clear that over all you are a “both sides” troll and trying to stop anyone from taking action to better solutions with purity tests.
Where have I trolled?
Your entire comment history is trolling. Or are you really that bad faith of a commenter? You goals seem to want to suppress pragmatic support for Palestine; which is something a genocider would want.
So you can’t actually point out where I’ve trolled.
You have to add that “seem” because never actually said anything like that. Strawman
I’ve asked you what your positions and real policy goals are, but you won’t answer.
I have answered. You declined the read my post.
Again, there’s a reason you needed that “seems”. Because I’ve never actually said that. Strawman