His grand vision remains to leave Mastodon users in control of the social network, making their own decisions about what content is allowed or what appears in their timelines.

I don’t use Mastadon cause I don’t care for micro-blogging, but nevertheless, I like this.

  • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have recently been using it more to connect with others on a new subject, but now for the first time ever on the internet since early 00’s, we are all owners of it ourselves. All the great new stuff was always owned by others and frankly I’m sick of it.

    I never even liked twitter. Then I followed #nature and #bloomscrolling on mastodon for a while and my home feed was a feast of beautiful pics. So now there’s one use for me for microblogging. Neat! Mastodon does what it says it does and even offers ‘default’ instances. I’d love for some GO’s to help reach that donation goal quicker, so we can all get with the program and ditch corpo social media. -Why doesn’t my library host it’s own peertube?? #MakeLibrariesGreatAgain

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    While this is a good move, I don’t think John Mastodon was making anywhere near the kind of money to turn into the next Musk or Zuck to begin with.

  • sighofannoyance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why is there this very loud chorus of people touting bluesky as alternative to twitter instead of the far superior Mastodon?

    Bluesky you are basically swapping a tyrant against a benevolent dictator, that dictator can become corrupted or sell bluesky to Musk Elon later on… That is not a solution that is more like procrastination.

    • RightEdofer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because BlueSky has designers and Mastodon is a nightmare for new users. Same reason a lot of “superior” open source apps never take off. Devs are rarely also good designers. Until we start caring about normal people it will stay that way.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is this actually true? The UIs don’t seem very different to me. What is it about mastodon’s design that’s bad?

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just the UX rather than the UI. It’s also missing some features like quote tweets. But it can be confusing to onboard either your own instance and know that your discoverable or to join an instance and know how discoverable you are.

          Like I am a career man in IT, servers, and networking. I have no idea if I were to run my own instance, who exactly on the network would be able to see my public posts

          • deathbird@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think the lack of quote tweets is a feature and not a bug. They facilitate a lot of antisocial behavior on other microblogging sites as I recall.