• TriflingToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    another implied fact: the pitcher MEANT to throw a baby, they just didn’t mean to throw a CHRISTIAN baby

    • Event_Horizon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s actually no evidence the pitcher was ever using a ball. And based off all the information provided it seems likely the pitcher has been throwing babies the entire game!

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s also never mentioned it’s a baseball game. It says you’re a baseball player, that’s it.

        Eigth implied fact : this is truly a game of basebaby (christian league), in which the standard accessory is a strictly regulated baby. It’s a license game, Smokey

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So what OOP is saying with their question is that the important attribute about that baby is that it is christian.

    Meanwhile to a sane person, the important attribute about the baby is that it is a fucking baby flying through the fucking air!

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    i like that all you needed was a hit to win but when you see the christian baby, you shift to a home run stance.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s because the “millions” you’d win were never contingent on you winning the game. You just made an oddly-specific bet with some really fucked up sports gamblers.

  • atomicorange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Implied fact: a baby is capable of having a religion, despite its inability to comprehend the concept.

  • SeanBrently@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    What kind of Christian baby? If it’s Pentecostal I’ll hit it out of the park, but a New Southern Reform Anabaptist baby? No way!

    • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I love that there is also the distinct possibility of non-Christian babies up there on the mound, with the pitcher as well.

      What happens if the pitcher throws a baby of a different faith? Infield fly rule that leads to a game ending double play?

      • SeanBrently@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Some baseball scholars consider any contact between the bat and a Hindu, Sikh or Buddhist baby to be foul bunt, and therfore an automatic strike. A Scientologist, Church of Latter Day Saints or Jehova’s Witness baby on the other hand is considered a fair ball unless caught in flight with runners on first, first and second, first and third, or bases loaded (with less than two out).