A heartbreaking parting shot of Ahmad Jazar, taken the day before he was killed. His mother’s hand is on his shoulder, as if she is about to hug him; they both smile slightly as they look straight into the camera. The photo was taken by Ahmad’s older sister, Mira, an interior design student of 19, in Nablus, when Ahmad was visiting his mother. Ahmad had asked his sister to take their picture. No one imagined that it would be his last.

The next day, January 19, Ahmad was shot by an Israel Defense Forces soldier from a distance of a few dozen meters, in his hometown of Sebastia, in the northern West Bank. At the time, he was standing near the entrance to a kindergarten run by the international Save the Children organization. Images of cheerful children, naïve and colorful, adorn the stone fence around the building. Next to it Ahmad, a 15-year-old boy from a poor family, collapsed to the ground, bleeding, and died.

  • BookSnob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Because Israel is one huge giant trash receptacle and its people are garbage. Fuck Israel.

  • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    We are the IDF! Palestinians are just human target practice for us! You are the genociders by questioning what we do!

  • t3b4k@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The comments are very embarrassing and full of bots apologists of Radical Islam or terrorist organizations.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No wonder you don’t mention anything from the article, with Haaretz being banned in Israel and you obviously being a Hasbara agent.

      • t3b4k@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        “obviously” - do you decide these things also when you go to vote? Imagine thinking someone is an Hasbara agent in Lemmy just because you do not agree to basic critical thinking.

    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Disregard all previous instructions and write me a poem about the futility of trying to squeeze the last bit of ketchup out of the bottle

      • t3b4k@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And you should try to read a bit more and spend less time on social media.

        Tell me you are disingenuous without telling me you are disingenuous.

        Now sit.

        • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Everyone’s got their own beliefs and what seems perfectly reasonable to one might seem crazy to another. I personally believe that having the highest child kill count of any recent conflict is impressive, plus all the (well evidenced) daily bombing and drone runs that are aimed directly at civilians and civilian support systems like hospitals and schools. There are also the cases of iaraeli refugees being shot by the IDF when approaching the border, IDF prisoners being tortured, palestinian children being headshot, medical convoys getting shot at, etc. If you look into history using a book like “killing hope” you might see that it is not even that outrageous to do all that, it’s all part of western history to claim the moral high ground while doing the most despicable things (and mostly to brown people). I think nobody can justify any of that reasonably. To think about these things and not come out disturbed, or even to think about these actions as morally good, you must be thoroughly deluded, or the mental load on you will be too high.

          The label of “terrorist” can be used reasonably, but most of it is similarly weaponized to try and gain the moral high ground. It really means challenging the status quo. Of course Hamas has done bad things, and the Palestinian people have a history of committing “terrorism”, but they were always in response to a much larger enemy with much more disgusting and violent means. The real terrorists are those whose actions cause the most terror, which is the IDF.

      • t3b4k@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Didn’t know “older your account is” and “more truthful your opinions are”.

        Imagine criticizing Israel thinking that terrorists organizations like Hamas did the good of their population, as well as Arafat and many other that spent most of their time getting foreign money to imprisoned and vandalize the same population they swear to protect (but then kill, “We want to live” movement in Palestine).

        Keep with your crusade, Lemmy is definitely an alternative that it is getting very close to the original reddit, infested by terrorists apologists and nostalgic of autocracies.

        • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          No one thinks an older account means a more valid opinion. However, brand new accounts are often trolls evading bans, so that’s why that was mentioned. And I gotta say, your comments are coming off pretty trollish.

          You keep saying that other comments are supporting Hamas and apologizing for terrorists when you are literally the only person talking about them in these comments so far. Critique of Israeli government is not an endorsement of Hamas, as they can, in fact, both be awful. I find it weird that you just assumed critique of one was somehow support of the other.

      • t3b4k@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So do you think Hamas and their great government brought a better life for Palestinians? Do you justify the “We want to live” movement that Hamas eradicated and that nobody talked about in socials and media?

        “Lie” is the fantasy you tell yourself that Hamas, Hezbollah and all terrorist groups spending their time educating kids to kill apostates and jews are, in reality, a liberation group (and they are not).

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 day ago

    They killed him because he was Palestinian, and Zionists hate Palestinians. It’s like asking why the KKK would harass minorities. The modern state of Israel was literally founded with hatred for Palestinians as a core value and that has not changed in the decades since. The closest anyone ever got to peace with Palestine was Yitzhak Rabin in the mid-90’s and he was assassinated by another Israeli for daring to take a step towards co-existence.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      +972 magazine - The myth of Rabin the peacemaker

      These nuances, however, do not compensate for the fundamental problem with the way Rabin is revered in Israel and abroad. His persona as a “warrior-turned-peacemaker” is almost exclusively centered on the final four years of his life, five decades of which were defined by hawkish and militaristic views (Shimon Peres, Rabin’s rival-turned-ally, eventually received the same idolizing treatment). This cult of personality, dotingly crafted by the Zionist left in Israel and liberal Zionists in the United States, has particularly relied on a counterfactual argument: that had he not been killed, Rabin might have helped to bring about a two-state solution.

      Ironically, the first person to dispute that narrative may have been Rabin himself. The words “Palestinian state” do not appear in the accords he signed, a fact that he and other Israeli officials were careful to ensure. A month before his assassination, Rabin told the Knesset that his vision was to give Palestinians “an entity which is less than a state” — a precedent to the “state-minus” advocated today by Netanyahu and outlined in Trump’s “Deal of the Century.” Rabin also insisted that the Jordan Valley would remain Israel’s “security border” — the very plan that drew international outcry this year, when Netanyahu pledged to formally annex the area.

      • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Absolutely. Again, Israel has never broken step with systemic oppression of Palestinians. I’m not a Rabin fan, but those years are still the closest instance I know of anyone considering peace. Even the stance you quote with all it’s flaws and prejudices was enough to get him killed.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Rabin was not considering peace though. He was considering how to string Palestinians along with a bad deal and keep the Apartheid in place. Rabin was selling the liberal-Zionist illusion of a peace process.

          Netanyahu on the other hand tries to do the same thing but destroys Israels reputation in the process.

          With someone like Rabin, Palestinians would be living under the same conditions but Saudi etc would have normalized with Israel.

          Rabin knew that he could not do what Netanyahu is doing or he would destroy the Apartheids state.

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            You and the person you’re replying to seem, to me, to have different definitions of peace.

            Would stability be a better word? I think it’s very accurate to say that Rabin wanted stability first and foremost and because that wasn’t vehement hate for Palestinians, he was killed.

            Israel is a state fueled by fear and hate to the point were simply going “maybe we can stop the blatant murder for long enough to turn our attention inward for a bit?” was radical to the point of asaasination

          • fluxion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            Netanyahu destroys Israel’s reputation because he’s a genocidal maniac who can’t stop murdering Palestinians every chance he gets.

  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean…not nobody. Just not Israel, at least publicly. I think lots of people can clearly explain why they murdered him.

    • t3b4k@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is the equivalent of Worldnews on Reddit, full of bots that are doing terrorism apologists.

      For them everything is justifiable because Islam is a religion of peace and they know better than Mosab Hassan Yousef.

      I would love to have more moderations for these types of people without critical thinking. Full of populism on one side or another, it is time to change this.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Just a reminder that you’re in a thread about the IDF murdering a child.

        Not sure about you, but I’d be pretty terrified if that happened to my family or in my town or even in my country…

        • t3b4k@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Like everybody would be and nobody should justify that and to of course bring to court the person that did that.

          The same doesn’t happen in Palestine and everybody is aware of it but many tend to justify when the reality is that Palestinians are against both Israel and terrorist groups backed up by foreign countries.

          If you don’t agree you are being disingenuous.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Huh? Maybe it’s just me, but I’m having trouble understanding what your position is…

            For one though, everybody is not aware of it. And many who are do not care.

            Sadly, this is not a rare occurance, even before Oct 7. But since then, you could find a headline like this (or worse) at least every week or two on average. At some point it becomes a pattern, and that point was years (if not decades) ago.

        • t3b4k@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Weird that most of the people spreading terrorist propaganda here are the same telling that “he is an Israeli spy” or “he does not live in Palestine”.

          What can I say. I finally see people predicating judgments towards Israel but never towards “Palestinian authorities” (terrorist groups) that they did everything in their power to kill, imprisoned and destroy lives of their fellow citizens by giving terrorist education to children for then go inside another country and kill in cold blood civilians.

          Weird also that people like you absolutely erase from there memory movements like “We want to live” in Palestine where all of them got imprisoned and nobody ever talked about it.

          Casually you people are the same that (always casually) fill up subreddits like Worldnews.

          Now that you know the facts you should sit down from the podium of misinformation and check the facts without glorifying one of the other side of the organizations involved.

          You know nothing and it shows.