I’ve been noticing an unsettling trend in the 3D printing world: more and more printer manufacturers are locking down their devices with proprietary firmware, cloud-based software, and other anti-consumer restrictions. Despite this, they still receive glowing reviews, even from tech-savvy communities.

Back in the day, 3D printing was all about open-source hardware, modding, and user control. Now, it feels like we’re heading towards the same path as smartphones and other consumer tech—walled gardens, forced online accounts, and limited third-party compatibility. Some companies even prevent users from using alternative slicers or modifying firmware without jumping through hoops.

My question is: Has 3D printing gone too mainstream? Are newer users simply unaware (or uninterested) in the dangers of locked-down ecosystems? Have we lost the awareness of FOSS (Free and Open-Source Software) and user freedom that once defined this space?

I’d love to hear thoughts from the community. Do you think this is just a phase, or are we stuck on this trajectory? What can we do to push back against enshitification before it’s too late?

(Transparency Note: I wrote this text myself, but since English is not my first language, I used LLM to refine some formulations. The core content and ideas are entirely my own.)

  • Paradox@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s giving me serious pause when looking at things like the new Bambu printer

    I really like my x1c, but I haven’t upgraded it’s firmware yet, and probably never will, because the local features are just too good. I know I can replace a lot of the bambu cloud features with octoanywhere, but I shouldn’t have to

    • Marvelicious@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I installed the X-plus firmware, switched to LAN mode, blocked WAN acess at my router and use Orca slicer and honestly, I’m pretty happy with the result. That doesn’t mean I’d give Bambu a second chance after their recent moves.

      • Paradox@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Apparently the h2d is crippled if you use offline mode. No cutter or laser support

        This is what I was always afraid of. With the x1c they didn’t really take away any hardware features if you put it offline and so the trade-off was acceptable. But locking you out of the physical hardware that you’ve purchased is a whole new story. Kind of like the dishwashers that require an app to do a rinse cycle.

        For what the h2d costs you can get an awful lot of printer from a different brand

        • Marvelicious@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Honestly, if I were in the market for another machine right now I’d be taking a hard look at building a Voron. I don’t WANT a project like that, but it seems like the best compromise in the quality and capability vs price compromise. I’m told they’re working on a 600mm³ model that may really tempt me when they finish.

          • Paradox@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah I’m keeping eyes on the voron.

            My next printer must have the following, else it’s not much of an upgrade

            • Multiple extruders or changeable tool heads
            • 500mm^3 print volume
            • Actively heated enclosure
            • Lidar and auto tramming
            • Ams like thing
            • Full opensource
            • Core xy. Not interested in a bed slinger