A justice suggests flouting democratic norms after taking part in a decades-long project to weaken democratic rights.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 days ago

    Cool, I’ll optionally listen to the next judge I get in front of and I’ll let you know how many feet under the fucking jail I end up.

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 days ago

      You’ll be lucky if there’s a real judge involved in the future if this is the way things are going to progress. You’ll get an immediate hearing with a judge from an executive branch judiciary division.

      Police officer: “you’re under arrest for walking outside of your socioeconomic zone.”

      Defendant: “When’s my trial?”

      Judiciary officer: “Right now.” [Gaval sounds] “Guilty.”

          • Wilco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            We already have Administrative Law Judges (ALJ). You can get tied up in a “court” hearing with a person that has never practiced law as a “judge”. This happens in administrative offices like Child Protective Services, the Social Security Administration, state unemployment agencies, and even the ATF. You can eventually appeal yourself out of these idiot-run hearings, but if you make a misstep like a missed hearing call or late form within the complex process you get denied justice.

            • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 days ago

              Thanks for teaching me something new, albeit highly concerning. Can you imagine how bad it might get if an administration that promotes unitary executive theory took control? Oh, boy. We’d be in some hot water then.