• RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s pretty easy if you have an e-mail job, but it’s hard to avoid American software with stuff like CAD.

    • KryptonBlur@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dassault Systemes (CATIA and SolidWorks) is French and Bricsys (BricsCAD) it’s Belgian/Swedish. Unfortunately PTC and Autodesk are both American.

    • jherazob@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The objective is not “perfect”, but “better than what we have”, there’s probably no way to get to perfect today within some niches, but there’s still chances of improvement

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That’s what I’m saying.

      • 3d composition
      • rendering
      • particle simulation
      • music production …

      Yes, you might be able to do it in European software but even if you might, it always means you waste a lot more time on it. And if your job’s competitive, there’s no way you have that to spare.

      Don’t get me wrong,I want things to change and I’m honestly really hopeful, but we’re not quite there yet.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only one i know of is rendering. Blender is open source and from the Netherlands (iirc) and just as powerful as anything else on the market.

        • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Blender is indeed really good, but depending on what you wanna do you’re at the mercy of an external renderer, which could either be EU (e.g. V-Ray out of Sofia) or from outside (e.g. Octane is from California).

  • Flyswat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I work on Linux. The Linux Foundation is based in America and has recently demonstrated it abides by american law (by kicking russian maintainers).

    Is there an alternative?

  • jherazob@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    For personal reference and for the lazy (i think it’s complete, did it in a hurry in a break):

    I note that a good portion of these are commercial products, frankly I’d trust MUCH more a FOSS product than a commercial one after so damn many over the years have betrayed us all in the search for profit, if you’re gonna migrate to something you may as well go for the FOSS ones that are less in danger of enshittification (not a guarantee but far less of a chance since a fork kills all the walls around a walled garden pretty quickly), even if the FOSS product is not as polished.

    • huppakee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks. Agree that this push away from us services should be seen as an opportunity to expand foss alternatives as well

    • rice@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      pretty sure “Nextcloud GmbH” is located in Germany (assuming the gmbh is real) and within nextcloud it has a replacement for all of those. Though nextcloud is pretty slow and clunky to run, it does work and does replace all of those by itself. (except email, run your own mailcow)

      • drspod@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Free Open Source Software. It is software that gives you the freedom to see the source code, make modifications to it, and redistribute your changed version of the software to your friends.

        FOSS software is generally developed in the open by a community of volunteers, although we are increasingly seeing FOSS projects take on funding from community donations or corporations that want to support the software’s development.

        You can read more about it on the Free Software Foundation page: https://www.fsf.org/about/

      • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        FOSS is either “Free and Open Source Software” or a Danish company that makes valves and termostats and stuff like that hehe
        EDIT: Wait no, that’s Danfoss I was thinking of, but FOSS is still a Danish company except it provides “high-tech analytical solutions”, whatever that means. Idk what’s the deal with “foss” names and Denmark, it doesn’t sound very Danish to me (as a Dane).

  • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean the largest problem in a business sense has always been cooperating with other businesses.
    That microsoft excel file your distributor sent you with builtin macros and code that just won’t function correctly in libreoffice calc and so on.
    It’s already a source of friction when university folks in sweden primarily using the google workplace want to coordinate with businesses in sweden that are mostly using microsoft office.
    In construction the most common way to coordinate with subtractors is through microsoft teams/sharepoint online, at least here in sweden.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          In my experience the world is run on CSV (and closely related like TSV), XML and JSON files when it comes to actual data exchange via files (as opposed to direct API usage where XML and JSON also dominate). Only the small minority of people working for companies still using ad-hoc workflows instead of custom software might send excel files instead.

          • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sure maybe for API and software type things but I’ve never seen an actual person email an XML or JSON file to another person.

            I have seen XML but XLSX and XML are pretty similar

            • taladar@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              As I said, companies still using manual processes because they haven’t gotten any of their processes turned into custom or off-the-shelf software might do that but that is essentially where most of the industries were in the 90s and now most are on generation 2-3 at least of custom software for their industry or even their company specifically for processes requiring data exchange.

              Many industries also created standardized formats based on XML at some point which is largely why they still use XML, e.g. ONIX in the publishing industry. Entire industries of third party handling for data for certain industries have developed since the times when sending Excel files to each other was common.

      • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just as many still uses Outlook and email as some sort of FTP service and then whine about reaching their 50GB/100GB M365 mailboxes.

    • rice@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      that’s a good thing, those macros are how office documents transmit more viruses than anything else lmfao

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s all pointless without replacing windows, which is impossible if you work in any sort of manufacturing job. CAD/CAM requires Windows (please don’t suggest FreeCAD), industrial automation requires Windows, any specialized devices with software control requires Windows.

    Heck, industrial PCs by and large run Windows, which is insane to me.

    • lazycog@feddit.ukM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Siemens is finally moving on to BSD IIRC and (slowly) industrial PC’s are going to switch over.

      Last new industrial windows based PC, server, as well as HMI I installed was in 2022. But yeah it’s slow.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      First of all, it’s not pointless – every little bit helps.

      Second, CAM requires gcode, and that runs on microcontrollers, not Windows PCs. Gcode can be emitted by all sorts of software, and not all of it requires Windows.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure but the vast majority of profession CAM software only runs on windows. Autodesk, SolidWorks, Mastercam, and Siemens NX all only have windows versions.

        And I think you’d be shocked at how many industrial machines do run on specialized embedded windows machines and not just little esp32 microcontrollers.

        Source: IT manager at a manufacturing company.

      • Pirata@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        First of all, it’s not pointless – every little bit helps.

        And I really want to emphasize this. People are having an “all or nothing” attitude about this when that’s not even the point.

        If we can replace 50, 40, even 30% of the US software we use daily with European alternatives, it’s already a massive win for us. The difference then adds up to millions at scale at the end of the fiscal year.

    • tuga@masto.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      @Damage
      Requires windows until an entire bloc legislates that any software vendor fir specific critical sectors must support #BSD or #linux… then it’ll suddenly not require windows.
      @Blaze