• Zetta@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’re correct but their LEO constellation is over 10x smaller than Starlink, so they’ve still got a lot of catching up to do.

    They are doing much better than other fabled starlink competitors though, like amazon kuiper which is still not a real thing after all this time.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 day ago

      They have one strong competitive advantage that Starlink will never have; they are not American.

      By definition, you cannot trust an American service. Even if the people who run a given service are not degenerates, there are enough degenerates in the US that they could elect a degenerate who will fuck you over.

    • GrosPapatouf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They have very, very different business models. Constellation size is meaningless on its own, you have to account for the satellites capabilities, orbits, and the number and needs of your customers.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’s true and I even thought about trying to investigate one of their satellites bandwidth capabilities versus one starlink satellite before I commented. But ultimately it doesn’t really matter because we’re talking about them being a rival to starlink so In the context of this conversation, they need to match their capacity and capabilities in all aspects to be a worthy rival.

        • insight06@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I don’t know, merely not being beholden to Musk is a pretty big competitive advantage at this point.