• Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      We migrated a bunch of clients back when we took over for other IT. Cloud was slower, way more costly, less utilitarian, and gave less control. I have no idea why people switched in the first place.

      I actually brought it up on an MSP subreddit back when I was still posting there and was relentlessly shit on.

      • dragonlobster@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The theory is that on-prem includes a lot of ancillary costs like a team of staff for maintenance (or cost for outsourcing it), hardware maintenance/upgrades, cybersecurity, dealing with failures, backup, load balancing, multi-region/multizone etc.

        I don’t think cloud solves all these issues necessarily and I am convinced if you do the calculations cloud ends up being more expensive depending on the scale. I think you really pay the premium for convenience, speed (of getting things going) and user experience (the software)

        • Tower@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          The biggest reason I think is SLAs and the ability to blame someone else when something goes wrong. I’ve seen it play out at multiple different companies now.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It is good for some things like a web server but bad for anything that involves high data or compute needs.

    • Oisteink@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Whith US uncertainty talk has already started, at least here in Norway more and more are talking about looking at exit strategy. Costs are huge because reinvestment but disruption is worse.