

Praying for it to be a neonazi who thinks the Labour party are communists
Praying for it to be a neonazi who thinks the Labour party are communists
He can take “The Storm Saxon” with him
I’m glad Kissinger lived long enough to suffer Zelensky scolding him for not being bloodthirsty enough.
Imagine watching your successors fuck up the empire you spent your long, ghoulish life building, and then when you finally try to warn them that they’re making a mistake, some upjumped little comprador cockroach, the kind you used to be able to have killed and replaced with a single phone call, gives you a public browbeating about your lack of commitment. And then you die.
RIP bozo
Oh right, the clause, the foreign emoluments clause, the foreign emoluments clause written to prevent exactly this, the clause on foreign emoluments… that clause?
It very specifically does not
The first time was a random ISB agent, the second was her driver, who she knew was an ISB plant, but was still someone she’d known for years.
Good to see inflammatory speech getting an inflammatory response
In a shocking twist, the descendants of nazis are also nazis
So no, putting down a CIA-backed counterrevolutionary uprising in a former Axis power, eleven years after the end of WW2 where they participated in the holocaust, was not a fuck up.
Israel has requested international assistance to combat the ongoing fires, reaching out to Cyprus, Croatia, Greece, and Italy for support.
The aid Israel will get after these fires compared to what Gaza has gotten in a year and a half of bombing is gonna jokerify me
I don’t have a link to direct proof, maybe there will never be any the way these things get lost in the fog of war, but I’ll copy in a comment from a couple of years ago
Bucha was definitely perpetrated by the Ukrainians, specifically the neonazi paramilitary battalions “Tornado” and “Safari” - seriously, “Safari battalion”
Many of the bodies in the streets were clearly from Ukrainian mortar impacts, as on satellite photos they appear at the same time as mortar craters while the Russians were still holding the town (the media’s only explanation for this is that Russia shelled their own positions because their asiatic brainpan makes them self-destructively evil). The photos of people who were executed show them with white armbands, which the Russians used to mark friendlies, and even with Russian ration packs. Why would the Russian armed forces, at the very edge of a perilously extended advance with incredibly stretched supply lines, give away rations probably worth their weight in gold to people they were then going to kill, and then leave behind the rations? Conversely, to Ukrainian fascists, receiving aid from the enemy obviously makes you a traitor - a position made law by the Kiev regime just a few months later - and for a fascist that means summary execution. There was even a short video from the time, where one soldier clearly asks “can I shoot the ones without blue armbands?” (Ukraine uses blue for friendlies) and someone else just says “yes”.
I expect the same killings by the Ukrainians took place in every town the Russians vacated, but it was definitely a concerted intelligence and media effort to specifically pick out the one town whose name in English looks and sounds like the word “Butcher” (this particularly stinks of MI6). The UK even refused Russia’s request for a UN security council meeting about it.
Add in the UAF’s behavior in Kursk and it’s pretty clear which side is the one purposefully killing civilians.
- Territories: Kuban, Belgorod and Kursk become Ukrainian-speaking regions
Even in their “Russians are the aggressors, Ukraine is just an innocent smol bean” wish-list screed they just have to blurt out their ambitions of ethnic cleansing
Exile to Elba arc let’s go!!
France also had special ops in Azovstal and mounted all kinds of crazy suicidal helicopter rescue operations to get them out.
French foreign legion beret insignia found in Azovstal
WW3 prevented entirely by the love of one man for making deals
Once again, MMT is only a description of how money works, in the same way that hydrodynamics is a description of how water works. Hydrodynamics can tell you how to build a pump for a well, but not whether you would be violating someone’s water rights. MMT can tell you how to utilize money to organize social activity, including the most relevant thing to us, building industrial capital, but it doesn’t tell you whether bond markets or anyone else would allow you to.
In fact, half of Hudson’s Killing the Host is about exactly how US institutions are completely beholden to finance capital, and would never allow the use of monetary policy to increase industrial production! Hudson uses the MMT framework to explain how the Federal Reserve prints staggering amounts of money to inflate the price of financial instruments (including stocks and bonds) for the benefit of financial capitalists, instead of printing money to inflate the prices of goods and labor which would lead to the formation of a productive economy.
The whole point of MMT is that money is just an organizational tool, like writing or calendars - as a technology it was invented (in the ‘western’ world at least) in ancient Mesopotamia and has persisted through multiple system of political economy. But in every case, its basic features are the same: it exists only as an IOU issued by a government, which can later be used to pay taxes, and a government with currency sovereignty can issue money at will to order people subject to its taxation (or who, for whatever other reason, need to obtain money denominated in that currency, such as, for instance, repaying IMF loans or making international trades) to hand over goods or perform services for the government.
Whereas this person is saying that the behavior of money depends on “the consensus of the monetary system’s stakeholders”, and the fact that the federal reserve didn’t take action to slow rising treasury yields (i.e. falling global demand for dollar holdings) is proof that you “can’t consolidate the central bank and treasury”. They seem to go on a lot about “constitutional consensus” as a reason MMT doesn’t work, as if the behavior of money in general through all of history is dependent on the specific provisions of a specific state’s constitution. They say “it is a constant theme of their literature that the foreign sector can be treated as a non entity that does impose constraints on policy space” when that is literally the opposite of true, and Super Imperialism is primarily about how US interference in other countries’ monetary policy prevents them from being able to use their currency sovereignty to develop their own economies.
It’s true that by the logic of MMT, a country with all of the resources it needs within its own borders (== within the boundaries of its monopoly on violence == within the region it can enact taxes on) can print however much money it needs to mobilize fallow resources (or until 100% employment is reached) while ignoring the effects on its currency’s exchange rate, precisely because it doesn’t need to obtain resources through trade - exactly as was seen in the USSR under Stalin and, as a shadow of that, Russia after 2022. The sanctions applied to Russia “should” have collapsed it, because most other countries in the world would have collapsed under this sanctions regime, but unlike those countries Russia is capable of producing all its own food, fuel and raw materials. Indeed, freezing a bunch of the oligarch’s money and preventing capital flight from Russia meant rubles had to be invested in productive industries, on top of the state increasing spending on war production, which combined to give a massive boost to Russia’s productive economy! However, the Russian central bank did everything in its power to prevent and undo this, because it’s controlled by neoliberals, so printing money to develop the economy “doesn’t work” because at every turn, neoliberals will sabotage it!
They say “sure would be cool if we had an agency in the government in charge of investigating insider trading”, but using their logic the fact that insider trading wasn’t investigated proves that it can’t be - and in our currently existing political economy, they would be right! Investigating insider trading is specifically against the financial interests of the groups that hold political power over this economy, so it is impossible to investigate insider trading in the same way it’s impossible to implement the recommendations of MMT for building a productive economy. But that doesn’t mean that ‘investigating insider trading’ as an activity can never occur, the same way it doesn’t mean that MMT is incorrect.
…rather than understanding that “green dollars” - the kind of money you keep in your pocket in real life - and “yellow dollars” - US treasury bills - are called that because of the color of the paper they’re printed on?? That seems like a pretty important feature of the dollar economy to be completely unaware of!
Xiaohongshu can’t return until the Infinity Tariffs have been enacted and every single dollar in the universe has been turned to dust
If you meet the Buddha on the road, cuck him