🇨🇦

  • 2 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle







  • tariffs hurt the populace of the country imposing them more than anyone else.

    Tariffs always hurt the customer, especially when it comes to raw resources; but can have the potential to hurt the seller as well (in the form of lost business).

    With import tariffs the recipient pays to import an item, directly costing them more. With an export tariff, the shipper pays extra, so they raise their prices to compensate, also costing the customer more.

    Now with manufactured products, the customer may have local options that are now cheaper than an import+tariffs (but still more expensive than they were paying previously), which means the foreign manufacturer has to invest in a local facility or loose customers. The customer may just be stuck with it though.

    With raw resources however, it’s much less likely the customer can purchase cheaper elsewhere so they will likely just be stuck with the higher cost.

    Potash for example, the US heavily imports from Canada for use in fertilizer and just doesn’t produce in sufficient quantities for it’s farmers (>90% is imported). If Trump follows through and imposes his tariff on that (I think that one was 10%), farmers will have no options but to buy less or spend more. It does nothing but harm the US.

    Likewise with Canada imposing a tariff on electricity; our energy companies are going to charge more per kwh to compensate for the extra costs, and the affected states will have no choice but to pay more. Again harming the US as a result of Trumps decisions.





  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.catoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldBut DrUgS at The Border!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Worse; you could buy people from the silk road. Wives, children, nanny’s slaves… Along with military equipment, drugs ofc, stolen goods, and pretty much anything illegal that has a buyer.

    Had a friend that liked buying drugs there, and would send me screenshots of some of the insane ads he found. He was pissed when it got shut down, and moved to a market called ‘Agora’.

    Broke off that friendship quite a while ago and haven’t heard about it since. Not really my scene…


  • From the linked article:

    The Take It Down Act is an overbroad, poorly drafted bill that would create a powerful system to pressure removal of internet posts, with essentially no safeguards. While the bill is meant to address a serious problem—the distribution of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII)—the notice-and-takedown system it creates is an open invitation for powerful people to pressure websites into removing content they dislike. There are no penalties for applying very broad, or even farcical definitions of what constitutes NCII, and then demanding that it be removed.

    It would mean Trump and anyone else could demand the removal of pretty much any image that features them; with legal penalties for not immediately complying.

    Think DMCA takedowns for youtube videos, but against every image on every platform available in the US. The platform has to comply, remove the flagged content, and let the courts sort out whether it should go back up.







  • Looking at openspeedtests github page, this immediately sticks out to me:

    Warning! If you run it behind a Reverse Proxy, you should increase the post-body content length to 35 megabytes.

    Follow our NGINX config

    /edit;

    Decided to spin up this container and play with it a bit myself.

    I just used my standard nginx proxy config which enables websockets and https, but I didn’t explicitly set the max_body_size like their example does. I don’t really notice a difference in speed, switching between the proxy and a direct connection.

    So, That may be a bit of a red herring.