You’re not alone.

Or just write in DemsNeedToListen ToThierVoters. Show them it was an ACTIVE choice not to back a shit candidate, and you were there, willing, and able to vote had they offered better.

Just following orders?

Man fuck that bitch!

The longer it takes to get there, the greater the harm to fix it.

I actually scrolled back to make sure this was The Onion. I’m just defeated that it’s not.

You imbecile! You’ve doomed us all!

Not feeble - infiltrated by traitors.

Jeez I have a subscription and didn’t even notice.

Hopefully a white elephant with lots of unknown problems and glitches that only pop up at 30k feet.

I’ve been most surprised by ACB. Of all his nominees she seems most independent.

To be fair I’m really starting to get tired of “peaceful and lawful means”, solely because it’s being used to trample our rights.

Hahaha no. ANNNNNNNNNDDDD it’s gonna be punishment for speaking out against him last week.

That makes a lot of (unfortunate) sense, other than Kelly approving it (I’m in Kansas). I’ll need to dig in more and make sure it wasn’t just a veto overridden by the Republican supermajorities, or else wasn’t a poison pill attached to must have legislation.

Because you’d know you’ve earned it.

It should still take the same amount of time when you get back. If they don’t like the response time, that’s on them.

And here we’re just trying to catch up to that 0% billionaire tax rate.

Based on the headline I thought I was clicking into The Onion. Fuck this timeline.

In Kansas it surprises me that Kelly signed it; I’d be more inclined to believe that the Republican supermajorities pushed it past a veto.

Can anyone explain to me why a BAN was even needed? If a State is FPTP that’s the way it is; why do they need to say a different way is not allowed? Especially because of that different way were to actually be viable enough to become law it would just be a one two step - repeal the old, then institute the new.