• 0 Posts
  • 124 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2025

help-circle


  • I know. Isn’t great? When there’s no party in true “control” then whoever wants to think it’s the other guy’s fault can easily do so.

    I was already an adult in 1996. It was definitely a bipartisan thing. Despite many tech insiders warning how it would cause the exact opposite of what it was intended to do, Clinton didn’t just sign it. He and Al Gore, for years, claimed it as their own.

    Hell, it was this exact act Al Gore was referring to when he claimed he “invented” the Internet.








  • You sure that’s what is happening, and it’s not just mounting a different snapshot/dataset being mounted “on top” ?

    I’ve seen it happen, which is why I ask. Assume the root dataset is named pool0 and has set0 set1 and set1/set2 as child datasets.

    Their mount points are as follows:

    /pool0/set0

    /pool0/set1

    /pool0/set1/set2

    Now, if somehow, say set2 gets unmounted.temporarily, and you save files to /pool0/set1/set2 while the data set is not mounted, it’ll actually put those files in the set1 dataset, under the set2 directory.

    But, when you mount the pool0/set1/set2 dataset again, the files under the set1 dataset are hidden by the set2 child.

    Am I explaining it well enough for you to follow along?

    Make sure you don’t have some similar situation by temporarily unmounting any nested datasets and ls’ing their mount points.



  • My network actually ran better when my OpnSense was virtualized on a Proxmox server running atop a Dell Optiplex 790 MT from like 2013, than it is currently on a bare metal Sophos SG-135v2.

    But that is because the sophos has 8 ports. And all 8 are a separate interface, so to use them as a switch requires bridging 7 of the 8.

    And that slows things down tremendously. I really just need an 8 port switch in there, I guess.

    The upshot is, the sophos came with rack mounts.