try caring if other people think you’ve proved your point dumbass lmao

the one you replied to is about America will collapse because they closed their eyes to the world

that’s stupid

I’m not trying to “disprove” you, I don’t have to, everyone can see that your thinking is centered on an obtuse not-even-wrong perspective

But the blame is actually on both parties.

there is some truth to this

The division they’ve created caused a thinking of us vs them.

this is stupid.

So you’re here to center your assumptions of Americans and their politics and then get annoyed when you aren’t taken seriously? Sounds dumb.

I don’t think you see American politics clearly from your position as a non-American.

Autistic levels of missing the point are a ‘you’ problem.

But what you’re talking about is stupid.

“stop attacking them” what, by noticing that they’re militant religious ethnocentrists? That’s your problem, you can’t handle the truth that a straightforward description of MAGA is ‘an attack.’

Your prissy neoliberal loving worldview is a deficit. They hate gays and are willing to lie and kill to get what they want.

Sometimes if your argument isn’t heard it’s not because people aren’t listening enough, it’s because your argument is bad and stupid.

Yet more proof people want to talk more than they’re willing to listen. You’re not being treated unfairly.

if you want unity you can’t incorporate the worldview of those who want to divide us in that worldview; that’s MAGA Christianity. you can only amputate the disease and trust that moderates will come together, but you’re not really doing the work, you’re just whining about how no one understands MAGA Christians or whatever.

more empathy for MAGA christians will not prevent them from killing you to instate a theocracy in which gays are in the closet, women can’t get abortions, and brown people are punished.

you’re not really listening here, and I suspect you’re uninformed/misinformed

Trump tore up the Iran agreement in his first term

Trump has inflicted a fictitious version of Putin on us, an idiot’s narrative of Russia.

Trump ignored the fentanyl crisis in his first term and China’s role in it

you really don’t get just how horrible it is that Trump ignores his intelligence agencies, do you?

other people are not critical thinking machines for you to force cogitation on your pet stupid ‘empathy’ project. have more empathy for the families being separated and less for the people who want brown people to suffer.

It’s possible to try and promote more tactical political thinking with regard to men’s problems without insisting that we consider more stupid arguments for delusional narratives justifying violence.

“How can we better understand election denialism?” is not coherent: fascists don’t care about the coherence of their worldview, only about justifying their violence.

Sometimes if your argument isn’t heard it’s not because people aren’t listening enough, it’s because your argument is bad and stupid.

But did the Democrats work to understand Russia, Iran, China?

The Democrats actually understand Russia, Iran, and China; the Republicans try and live in a delusional narrative about Russia, Iran, and China.

Extending “charity” to delusional narratives only extends the duration of the delusion.

I’m not saying oligarch Democrats aren’t part of the problem, but a major problem we have is way too much charity for stupid stupid thinking.

What a childish take.

well your moral purity doesn’t matter because this is politics. the decisions we make about our society fall into grey areas and tough decisions. you don’t want to do that work you don’t have to, but you’re part of the problem if you think you’re being a decent person right now by grousing about indecency.

a moral vision isn’t enough, there must be a practical one, and if you’re useless in that endeavor, have the grace to stay out of politics.

I’ll at least admit the existence of patriarchy, which is more than you will get with Lemmy’s misogyny problem.

It’s weird that you found a way to center women in this topic about men. Please think about that.

I used the word “histrionic” – “histrio” is Latin for actor.

Elsewhere I said:

She’s performing histrionic masculinity; men who can’t control their emotions become a problem for the movement.

Quit being such a weak man, allowing your emotions to govern your reaction.

I’m a misandrist: men fucking suck, and your masculine display of emotional incontinence is what makes men such a problem for women.

As to misogyny? I don’t think women are all that great, either, but I’d rather work with women than men, for the most part.

Provided they can woman up.

She’s performing histrionic masculinity; men who can’t control their emotions become a problem for the movement.