笑死
wheres my live action chinese wuxia version where hitler is literally some kind of demon and the soviets naruto run and fly through the air casting spells to repel bad nazi energy during battle
“there is an imbalance of yang energy here” jumps onto a ppsh and surfs on it off into the night
I’d be careful of that. There is plenty of evidence that abuse in lesbian relationships is as high as in straight relationships. I think when we assume that abuse in relationships is primarily a male problem we are whitewashing abuse by women and abuse in relationships where there are no men. Whenever I point this out it seems to upset a lot of people but that is not my intention. Interpersonal conflict and abuse in general is genderless so we should expect there to be abuse in relationships of the LGBTQ+ variety. The factors that contribute to abusive partners are much more complicated than just a “power dynamic”. Further, power dynamics can exist in many ways that aren’t exclusive to traditional masculinity.
this is a secondary question to the breasts on the miis… can they lactate?
that guy was so wacky that i actually believe the whale story
But in other styles of government if individuals commit war crimes we must judge the government itself even if it holds those individuals accountable? Why should we carve out an exception for a democracy in this regard? Oh, because “Chiner”. That’s right.
Well, either way, he’s begging to be held accountable. Either he is held accountable and everyone else involved in all countries in the west or we must judge all those “democracies”. This is the double-standard he set for himself.
deleted by creator
the average person in a xianxia novel is more skeptical of the existence of demons than your average american
im 42 and this man inspires me
Sadly. While they talk this talk they continue to provide zionists with material support.
it just feeds me news about china from mostly pro china sources and ads for iqiyi and viki now and you know what, im okay with that
congo free state but for landlords
I was actually just looking into CSAM
Quote: VibeCoder, 2025
We got 'em.
only real ethical use case is using it for yourself, like on your own picture for entertainment purposes but of course people like us dont need that because hexbear users are already a fucking snacc
Nice. So what’s the scheme? A real estate investment grift where you help get funding to build housing for the homeless that has no obligation to keep its promises after a criminally short period of time? Or just the old-fashioned skim off the top?
… I kid I kid, I hope you do some good work out there and really help some people who desperately need it.
That’s hilarious and also good on you. Neurodivergence wins again. I think people new in rhetoric can’t help but answer a carefully laid out question because that is how conversation works. But in debate if you someone says, “well if you think this then would you…” you know they are leading you somewhere. You can reject the premise.
JP knows this and employs it but he decides to employ it so often in a few sections on absolute gimme questions, like “would you lie to Nazis”. Some will say it’s because he’s crypto and maybe so but I think he sees the trap being laid and wants to avoid it. He can always avoid it later the line or claim a false-equivalency. But the real irony is that he didn’t need to be in that situation in the first place if he didn’t try to post-structurally prance his way out of the belief question. Oh, you wouldn’t put yourself in the quagmire of lying to a Nazi, bitch, you couldn’t even avoid the quagmire of dodging this set of questions.
I used to listen to Dillahunty on the Atheist Experience debate callers. This was a public access show in Texas. To say he’s an experience debater on the topic is a massive understatement. I did not watch the entire debate he did with JP because I knew he was going to walk all over him. I’ve heard JPs rhetoric on the subject and it’s amateur at best. I think even a worm like Tom Leykis could have wrecked JP in that one. At least he has that funny line, “I don’t know and you don’t either.”
usa unironically doing the social credit thing
A few things I noticed about Peterson “debates”.
Most importantly people don’t know how to “debate” these kinds of people. You don’t go in for something serious. You go in to make them look like a clown because they aren’t serious. If one line isn’t doing the trick you change tactics. Unfortunately this involves studying the tapes on these people. Watching a ton of them and learning the rhetorical devices they use and how to defeat those devices. How to craft rhetoric carefully to paint them into a corner and not give up when they refuse your rhetorical device.
And never forget, you can always reject a rhetorical device. JP does it frequently when he can see it’s going to back him into a corner. You can return that. When your opponent makes a declarative statement you can just say, “no, that isn’t true.”
trump bragged about it afterwards too saying that he sent them in there and they took him out like a dog
they would be angry about a play that glorified chinese resistance fighters to unit 731
(reminder that the united states granted immunity to the japanese who did those atrocities in exchange for their human experiment documentation)