Totally agree about their votes not being gettable. But they still always vote. They’re reliably going out there and doing their civic duty, not staying at home and complaining about policy. But if democrat voters reliably voted, they’d be catered to. Democrats need to always vote because not voting is not a punishment for anyone but ourselves by taking away any representation we have.
He was elected to his FIRST term, at 70??? That’s fucking insane.
It’s both. The Republicans expect the Republican voters to come out and always vote and always vote Republican. Which they do. And the Republican voters expect the Republican representatives to adhere to their beliefs through the fear of the primary.
The problem is Democrats only have some of it. They have the democratic representatives expecting Democrats to always come out, but the voters don’t. Because of the democrat voters not coming out, because of them not putting the fear of the primary in the representatives, Democrats don’t have to adhere to their constituents as much as Republicans. If we want Democrats to cater to us, we need to both always come out in the primary and the general. But also force primaries to kick out Democrats who don’t follow the base. Because if we don’t always come out and vote, Democrats have to cater to the people who DO always come out and vote. Which are Republican voters.
Democrats have put forward voting reform laws that get rid of gerrymandering and citizen unity and have supported getting rid of insider trading for Congress members (although that one has less support). There hasn’t been the proportional voting reform put forward in Congress but the only party fighting for that on the state level is Democrats. Maine got it passed because of Democrats campaigning for it. So saying that Democrats wouldn’t do any of what I talked about is BS.
Democrats who throw marginalized voices under the bus deserved to be primaried and kicked the fuck out of office. They’re supposed to be supporting us, not giving an inch. And if the people currently in office won’t do that then the thing to do is primary them, not just abandon the Democratic party.
Edit: republican voters put the fear of the primary in their elected representatives if they didn’t/don’t support all of Trump’s policies without question. We should be putting the fear of the primary in the Democrat representatives too.
Definitely agree. On all your points. I’ve had AI be able to tell what I’m working on in my IDE and be able to literally complete the rest of my code for what I was doing with minimal errors. It’s pretty nuts. Same thing where I was learning a new programming language and the AI was able to help me basically convert my knowledge of prior languages to the new one. It’s ability to teach, as long as you continue to ask questions about it because sometimes its first answer is wrong, is really helpful!
I think AI summarization and search are also great. Particularly search can be great for those of us who are both bad at googling things and are tired of the ads. I’ve had questions that I’ve googled and have to go through so much to get to the right thing (simple stuff, just differences between stock and broth or whether to throw out meat that has a slight smell to it), but then you ask the AI and boom, there’s the answer. And with AI it’s a lot easier to do the search, you can just ask the question instead of having to use fancy techniques for getting the right results.
AI has some great uses but the problem is that it’s getting used in ways it shouldn’t be at all. Like the way the article talks about and in any artistic fashion. AI is a very exact tool, not a catch-all for everything.
This is of course bigger than just AI but this kind of thing is one of the things that really bothers me about it. AI is useful for a handful of things, I’ve mainly just found it useful to help debug code. But the industry puffs it up so much as this revolutionizing force which leads to people doing things like this. Take a tool that is useful in less than a handful of circumstances and have it do EVERYTHING. Because the industry says it can and they wouldn’t lie right?
Of course all this will do is revoked visas of brown immigrant students.
Fuck dude, I hope that all the calls that his office is getting shows him he fucked up. The right will never like him, they view him as a globalist who believes in science and shit.
Maybe, maybe, he will have a trans advocate on his podcast who will give the information about how BS this shit was. But even if he does, the damage has been done.
This is another moment that shows why we need to remake the democratic party during the primaries next year. We need to go out and vote for progressive candidates so people like Newsom see that progressive is the right way to go, not this shit he’s doing.
Some stuff from your link
Republicans can’t pass a spending bill without Democrats but they’re trying to ram through a MAGA budget disaster that slashes essential programs, attacks basic rights, and enables the Trump-Musk coup.
They can pass that budget without Democrats. They’re going to use Reconciliation like the Democrats did under Biden. So this one is moot. Also in this point they talk about how the Democrats just have to refuse to vote for a bill that cuts the social programs. Which they have. So both moot and already done.
Deny a quorum to completely freeze Senate business. If Republicans don’t have 51 votes on the floor, Democrats can walk out, preventing the Senate from doing anything at all.
What? The Republicans have 53 senators. As long as each one is there they can still do whatever they want. This one just doesn’t make sense.
Refuse to give an inch. Block every unanimous consent request and force the GOP to waste precious time on every single step of the process.
This one is actually dead on and something that should happen.
So basically the article you linked has 3 ways the Democrats can fight back. The first way is something they’re already doing, refusing to vote for a budget that cuts programs. But also the point is moot because it says they need Democrats to pass the MAGA budget but they don’t. So that point doesn’t work. The second is also moot because the Republicans have 53 senators and will be able to do stuff if the Democrats are there or not. And the third is actually an option they can do.
So your article has 1 possible action while acting as if the Democrats aren’t already doing another one of these. The article is saying they will gladly vote for a budget that cuts the programs despite the Democrats saying they won’t.
Thanks The Guardian for not mentioning how he also talked about a trans woman that set a new record on a race by 5 hours. Turns out 2 things, the race is over 800 miles and takes 8 days so 5 hours is next to nothing, and also that it was a Co-Ed race. So the trans woman set a record in a race that takes 8 days and I would bet she set that record because she traveled just a little bit faster than her competition.
He portrayed it as the trans woman setting the record in woman’s sports but if he said it was a Co-Ed race then his point would be moot. But the Guardian can’t talk about that because they are on his side there.
So CBS News, who is currently in a lawsuit with Trump for supposedly showing favor to Harris in a 60 Minutes interview, put out a poll showing people like what Trump is doing?
Sure. Totally not CBS trying to kowtow to Trump and hope he’ll drop his suit if they put out a poll showing people like what he’s doing and think he’s Tough, Energetic, Focused, and Effective.
Hey I’m curious, what do you think about the Democrats is “too far left”? Like actual policies because the article you linked lists 4 positions that aren’t a part of the parties platform and never have been.