MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 74 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 10th, 2024

help-circle






  • Entirely in agreement. Given the 2 options, and the complex relations, it’s the more strategically sound course. I hate that that’s true, because if it weren’t I could be more upset at a lack of action. But option 2 has a lower risk now and the more successful that strategy is (the longer they can maintain that course) the lower the risk of BOTH option 1 and option 2 in the future. The direct risk associated with option 1 is very high (war and destruction of China as a possibility) but they are accelerating ahead in a way which is constantly lowering that risk. Option 2, of course, has risks, but those are mostly risks associated with a loss of soft power in the Western Left. Global southern groups are generally more receptive to China’s help than they are to our pleas for China to take over the world order and destroy the US.



  • Going underground has been a successful tactic, where the structure and leadership are opaque but actions are still clear. We also just exist in a world of surveillance which has made the lessons from the Bolsheviks in this case almost irrelevant. Lenin sat on a train with someone hunting him and wasn’t caught. You gotta get 7 surgeries and wait 5 years to possibly pull that trick that he did by just not having known photographs spread far and wide.



  • Maybe it’s terrible advice, but I would say just to explain all that in an email or something (sans any direct attempt to get him back/sans saying anything about ‘love,’ according to circumstances like relationship status and how your mental health would be affected). I’m sure it would be something that, even years later, might be nice to know for himself and it might lift this burden a bit from you. You just need to be candid and explain that you processes the passing of your mother in a way which you regret and likely wasn’t best for you, and that he may have been hurt without this knowledge.

    If you’re both single and he replies with something accepting/sympathetic, you can take it from there with asking if you could see each other to explain more or catch up. But there’s a chance he was also hurt and won’t be happy. Idk, it’s rough and I don’t want to sound like I know everything about it. I’ve just experienced multiple times now that telling people things, even an apology 10 years later, usually feels good and people take it well




  • I think I agree with all of this? I am also a huge fan of Laussen and think we should more highly regard his analyses. But does this disagree with me in some way for me to reflect? Like, does the this inform how European Bourgeois element will react to the crises arising from the developments around neoliberalism vs sovereignty (this is the term that I prefer, but i get the usage of nationalism)?

    I think that the easiest reaction for the Bourgeoisie in Europe is to move Capital investment eastward while shifting ownership westward until the entire system collapses and is subsumed in China and the Global South’s “sovereignty” dynamic. Europe, during that shift, will either join the US in failing or just easily slide over into more equal footing with the rest of the world.

    The other option, that the comrade above is highlighting, is that (some other, maybe?) contradictions will lead to a large split between Europe and the US before the total collapse. I think this is enticing, and could fit Laussen’s contradiction because Europeans are pretty self-righteous and maybe unwilling to fully subsumed themselves to US interests when against their own. I tend to think European leaders too weak to possibly do that, but I hope to be proven wrong.