The business model just doesn’t make sense then (using search partners).

Because $60, let alone $120 US, a year is far more than most people would be willing to pay.

Dunno what to say, it’s just more than most people can justify paying for the service.

I’m gonna stick with DuckDuckGo and the newly free mullvad cached search

Presidential pardons are one of the dumbest powers. Change my mind.

(Plenty of more stable countries get on fine without it, and don’t have to deal with this nonsense to boot)

This is because people assume that you should do it out of the goodness of your heart. Since you’re not mass producing.

Which is absurd.

If anything they should be willing to pay you a premium for a high quality product produced in far better conditions.

Old man yells at cloud these damn Americans using “ironic” when they mean “sarcastic”

I honestly wonder what these sorts of jobs are. I feel like I have barely any reason to use AI ever in my job.

But this may because I’m not summarising much, if ever

AI can’t think, and how long emails are people writing to ever make the effort of asking the AI to write something for you worth it?

By the time you’ve asked it to include everything you wanted, you could have just written the damn email

Downvoters mad to find out cars are inherently unsafe and need very good infrastructure and to be remotely safe.

Downvoters mad that E_k= ½mv², and speed, funnily enough, is dangerous.

Downvoters mad that manual transmission isn’t making cars safer.

Car go vroom vroom, but public transport go better

Fax

I’d happily pay for search, but Kagi is way too expensive.

10 searches a day, for $5/month? (US)

Like, that is way too much.

I can receive thousands and send thousands of emails per day for that price. Is search really that much more expensive?

This is what I’m planning to do with some textbooks I want for my work.

$200-$300 and you want me to download an app that may or may not even work in 10 years?

Nah, I’m gonna future proof my access no remorse 🏴‍☠️

I will pay though, because it’s tax deductible, and also because it I ever get questioned on it (since I use them around coworkers and management), I’m golden.

This is a misunderstanding, apologies. I’m saying if you’re advocating complete legalisation of distribution of every single drug out there, then I’m using hyperbole to point out that this is too much “freedom to” without considering “freedom from”.

I think all drug use should be decriminalised.

I’m not arguing for criminalisation of use and posession.

Just making distribution of all drugs legal is overkill, in my opinion

There is of course nuance to this, and I don’t claim to be an expert on classifying drugs. Though, I don’t reckon I need to try to hard to argue that there are drugs far worse than alcohol out there. I’m simply stating a blanket “all drugs should be legal” is overkill.

Alcohol certainly is ripe for abuse, also.

Decriminalised use/possession, for sure.

But I always think the libertarian “just legalise all the drugs” is just odd.

Regulated? So you mean preventing people from taking really stupid shit? Sounds great sign me up lol

People gotta accept there are trade-offs to living in a society, and one of those is that there’s a limit to which we allow each other to get high. Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a “war on drugs” style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

You wanna take shit like meth? Cool, go out to the woods and never use socialised medicine where workers are at risk from people on such drugs, or just randoms walking down the street.

I don’t think taking hard drugs should put you in prison, or even give you a criminal record, but actually legalising the distribution? Nah. Go live in the woods/hills away from everyone else.

I found this help article where they say “Although not all non-genuine supplies may cause quality issues”.

They said they recommend using theirs, but up until this they didn’t say you couldn’t.

https://support.brother.com/g/b/sp/faqend.aspx?c=us_ot&lang=en&prod=dcpl2647dw_us&faqid=faq00000184_002

Plus, it’s been universally understood that you have been able to use third-party cartridges. I really think if you’re persistent enough, you’d get a refund in Australia. Because else (in Victoria at least) you could take them to VCAT for like $70, which will cost them wayyy more in lawyer expenses than the price of a refund.

This is not legal advice, but I reckon a refund under Australian Consumer Law is extremely doable if they go down this path (for existing printers).

I’m curious how this will go down in Australia. Seems like a pretty solid slam dunk refund, oh the product doesn’t work as advertised anymore?

Cool, I’ve had this for 5 years and now I’d also like a full refund under Australian Consumer Law.

Motherfuckers.

(I don’t actually own a printer)

I also do not enjoy the taste of fish. High five haha

The country of origin can be indicated with a flag and/or in writing.

🇹🇩🇷🇴 Chad or Romania, Chad or Romania?? [PANIK]