Es wundert mich nicht, dass meine “Fish-Linux” (BSD Kugelfisch) Referenz auf BSD nicht verstanden wurde. Halt einfach keine echten Nerds hier…

Ich nehme nur Meinungen entgegen von Leuten die Fish-Linux from Scratch auf ihrem main device betreiben.

Deine Frage ist irrelevant da nicht GPG signiert.

Es ist genau dieser wiederliche Elitismus der die gesamte Nerdszenen durchzieht der sie so unerträglich macht.

It also includes a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license for the purpose of doing as you request with the content you input in Firefox. This does not give Mozilla any ownership in that content.

It’s still in the current version of the TOS without a direct explanation which can be found anywhere close to it. This is plain bad from a communication stand point.

To be fair nobody asked Mozilla to serve a stupid and detached statement without contextualizing what they meant or try to achieve.

[Edit] it feels like they’re asking for the outrage. You can’t just drop assurances of not selling data without explaining if your crowd is privacy aware. You can’t take broad licenses from your users if you don’t explain for what they are for. Having plaintext comment next to the lawyer speak would have fixed all that and none of this had to be this shitty. [/Edit]