

you have described how contextual authorial intent works, yes
I exist or something probably
you have described how contextual authorial intent works, yes
it is objectively true that it’s irresponsible to answer as he did, that doesnt mean he shouldnt have done it from a journalistic perspective, but certainly for anyone without the clear intent of potentially being arrested. Dont talk to cops.
it’s criticized in general as a dark pattern that encourages toxic habits and is anti consumer. it is secondarily a problem because aint nobody got time for that shit.
there are lots of things that pharma companies do which are abusive, but the existence of treatments is rarely one of them. Herbal medicine is cool but inconsistent, relying on inconsistent medicinal dosing will kill people. Other comments point out the question is more “how to do industry” than anything else. And no 99.9% of medicine disappearing will in fact kill people.
This is not something you want to speculate on, the point is that in an anarchist society, biochemical engineers, doctors, researchers, would be figuring out methods to make and produce useful medicine. Dont go all primitivist on it because it’s a complex problem that capitalism leeches from parasitically.
what kinda glowie nonsense is “dont talk to cops” now fascism? dont talk to cops, get a lawyer.
If everyone gave up on a place when futures there look bleak, there wouldnt be a place left in the world worth living in.
no you see they’re right, sufficiently simple is just a fancy way of saying the trivial answer of “doesnt exist”
why do you care that someone didnt say it was worse enough? “x is a problem, if y is true then z is a problem” -> “why didnt you talk about x”
silly.
Because these are often sold with profile building features, for example, recall. Recall is sold as “local only” with profile building features. So it continues to be centralized pii that is a point of failure. As the quote says, as i said.
I don’t care if your language model is “local-only” and runs on the user’s device. If it can build a profile of the user (regardless of accuracy) through their smartphone usage, that can and will be used against people.
emphasis mine from the text you quoted…
building and centralizing pii is indeed a privacy point of failure. what’s not to understand?
you dont fight for what is, but for what can be.
arguably the parkour platforming physics are important to a parkour platformer, though…
while it definitely depends on the person, language is a versatile thing. consider all the varieties of meaning simple words like “fuck” have. it’s not at all unusual to have words with conflicting contextual definitions.
i see, the computer version of a prehensile tail…
if you give up before they even start then you lose without trying, and then they will still find ways to arrest you.
no, i mean theoretically who knows, but practically no. compressing something to be more dense than a solid is energy intense. you are surpassing the bond energy of moleculesto do it. second, compressing enough osmium is going to take less, but still bigajoules, of energy. the compressive stress is immense. anything that could hold thht stress is much too big to fit in the package.
You’re also unfortunately simply wrong
notably
We found substantial asymmetry in total following across platforms: Right-leaning online shows had at least 480.6 million total followers and subscribers — nearly five times as many as left-leaning.
“they looked at the thing that they wanted to look at” also rogan is still among the top podcasts including on spotify. the study if you read it, is looking at what 21% of adults get news from. 77% of the sources that 21% get some or most of their news from are spreading climate misinformation.
“how old is a country” is almost nonsenscal. Constitutions have dates, countries are continuos fluid things. Ill illustrate with an example: How old is your family? do you go by your oldest relative, your last name, some ancient family tree, or do you go all the way to LUCA? it’s nonsensical.