Yes. Who’d expect a random anon to do more than vaguebooking an episode without links and then using that as “proof”.

You utter berk.

Translation: “I’m too lazy to back up my bullshit.”

Buh-bye.

Tell me you’ve never spent even five minutes doing artistic photography.

… they’re both just pushing a button to make an image at this point.

Ah, yes. That’ll do.

Oh FUCK YOU for trying to tie your LLMbecile wankery to human rights!

Just fuck the fuck right the fuck off.

No they aren’t. “Naming” and “seeing” are two radically different words that mean radically different things. In ancient China, for example, there was no word for green or blue. Instead there was a single word that covered both: 青. (In modern linguistics such terms are called “grue”.) You’ll find similar things in many other cultures’ linguistic history (some even extending to today!).

It doesn’t mean they couldn’t see the difference. All you have to do to disprove that is look at ancient painted beams in China and see the clearly delineated green and blue segments in complex patterns. If they literally couldn’t see blue, this would not exist, yet oddly it does. In fact all they did was classify things differently from modern English. (Today they have 绿 and 蓝 for green and blue respectively, using 青 only for colours like turquoise or the colour of blue-green algae. This is, however, very recent: literally 20th century. The characters have existed for a long time, but were used as shades of 青 for most of that history like we use “sky” and “navy” as shades of blue.)

Trying to claim that they literally couldn’t see blue because they named it differently and categorized things differently is risible on the face of it. This would be like me claiming you couldn’t tell the difference between sky blue and navy blue because in English they’re both called “blue”. It takes literally seconds of thought to figure out that this claim is bullshit using just your own language and colour differentiation as the evidence.

If you find yourself under intense economic pressure, you may wish to consider replacing last year’s Bentley with something lower grade like a Jaguar this year.

The number of people who believe that ancient civilizations couldn’t see blue is truly scary to me.

And here we have it exactly: intentionality is what distinguishes art from slop.

It’s one of the oldest misconceptions in the realm of human interaction. People think it’s the idea that is hard in art, not the execution. People that unironically stupid thus cannot possibly understand that typing “five-boobed anime girl with big cock, huge boobs” is NOT CREATIVITY. It’s just a brain fart.

Except that they’re not making an image for themselves, now, are they?

Two points:

1. The arguments are not even remotely the same beyond sharing a grammatical parallel. Sort of.

2. You know this.

What a strangely coded accurately coded and emotionally loaded completely honest critique. “Lazy ai bros who don’t understand care about consent”

Fixed that for you.

Nobody who buys a Big Mac tries to pass it off as them being a chef.

Nobody who posts on social media tries to pass it off as them being published writers.

Nobody who buys clothes tries to pass it off as them being seamstresses.

AI bros call themselves “artists” for doing the functional equivalent of going to Rotten Ronnies and ordering a Big Mac and asking for no pickle.

Point well made.

Tell me you don’t understand the impact tariffs have without saying it out loud.

Trump’s tariff deadline looms … U.S. stocks set records

That’ll do it.

The first memes?

Predate civilization.

Yeah. President Camacho cared about the country. He was just ill-equipped to run it.

Trump doesn’t even care.

It’s only going to get worse because we’re further away from media literacy than ever before.

Fixed that.

The average American reads at a grade 7 or 8 level.

我该如何用ASCII写这个句子？

Never underestimate the power of backing up a dump truck filled with cash and tipping it onto the front yard of someone you’re trying to buy.