What’s your favourite content warning?

There’s multiple examples of queer tankies celebrating hamas and the massacres, you can view it on this community

It’s more the irony of tankies and queerfolk celebrating and praising Hamas and the massacres. Very much chickens for KFC

No apologia

I think the pro-Israel side thinks this was started on 10/7/23 and the pro-Palestinian side recognizes that the war started in the 1940s and has never at any point in time stopped.

I think you shouldn’t make any blanket statements.

But you’re skirting the question. You’re ignoring the Tankies, Hamas and celebration of the massacres. That is the key topic here.

They themselves say that what they do only applies to US politics, so reporting on Israel and Palestine is out of scope in the first place. But their definition of bias is also weird.

While this updated methodology reduces the influence of a strictly U.S.-centric political spectrum, it remains primarily tailored to the political landscape of the United States. This ensures that evaluations are relevant to a significant audience while acknowledging that some biases in the U.S. context may not apply exactly in other countries where terms like “Liberal” may have a different meaning. Readers should consider this when comparing sources with political systems from other countries.

Perhaps it’s more apt to say Western than the US, but it’s still generally applicable. The part about the US is also relevant to the bias, not the factuality.

They explain the overall definition of bias inside the methodology, where they compare the different kinds of bias to make the final definition.

The economic system of a news outlet depends on whether that news outlet is public, private, or government. For example, the BBC doesn’t need to worry about viewership or ad revenue because it gets its funding from the government.

You can view how they rate bias on each outlet’s page. Neutral language and fact-based reporting are the key defining factors for their bias.

But if you don’t want to use it, you don’t have to.

i don’t think anything will convince you lol.

you don’t gotta use it if you don’t wanna! but i am curious what you think about the main topic at hand here, with tankies praising hamas and the massacres.

They do have methodology, though :c

Okay, what do you use then? And what makes MBFC poor? It’s used in !world@lemmy.world

The post? Yeah. It’s admins, developers of lemmy, endorse this sort of content. You can see their comment in the image.

Apologies you were caught in the brigade

@ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works

Ah, apologies, I double-checked and no Hexbear users are in the image. I’ve since edited the title.

Oh, they both are. It’s quite dire.

No apologia, please edit your comment

I mean that would be a lot of work, are you really contesting all of this? I don’t have it all on hand but can provide some materials if you’re interested in specific points.

Yes. It’s important to stick to the known facts.

No apologia. There is no justifying the death of children

If you don’t have any evidence to support your claims, then don’t make any.

Please supply evidence for every point you’ve made

What does this have to do with communism anymore? :(