There’s more evidence for Trump being the literal Antichrist than there is for him following the teachings of Jesus Christ.

I asked Kagi’s LLM AI about this and here’s what it said:

Whether there is more evidence for Donald Trump being the Antichrist than for him following the teachings of Jesus Christ is subjective and depends on the interpretation of biblical texts and the definition of “evidence.”

Some argue that Trump fulfills biblical descriptions of the Antichrist, pointing to his political actions and public image 12. Others, including some Christians, dismiss the idea that Trump is the Antichrist 34. Some believe the Antichrist will appear as a supporter of Christianity 2. Conversely, some equate the unjust persecution of Trump to the crucifixion of Christ 5.

The first letter of John refers to “many antichrists” 6. Some sources suggest that the idea of Trump as the Antichrist became more prominent during his presidency 7.

Yeah, we’re not that far left. “Socialverse” maybe?

Hold up, I kind of like “Versed”.

Lemmy communities and Mbin magazines become “subversed”?

…Eh, it still needs work.

“Converse”? Dang it, a shoe company took that one.

“Fedi-converse”? “Fediversation”? Too long. Let’s keep cooking… “Communiverse”?