piefood

No, I don’t. In fact, their wikipedia page shows activity up to 2022

As soon as you go back, and read what I’ve already written, I’ll continue this conversation

I wish this was true. I live in a fairly blue area, and I see them IRL all the time. I’ve been called a “mindless Trump drone” for saying that the Democrats should stop running unpopular candidates and unpopular policies. I’ve been told I was a monster for thinking that the Democrats shouldn’t put up rapists as presidents, and that they shouldn’t bomb children.

While I do think the blue cult is amplified online, I think it is, unfortunately, very real as well.

No, it’s democratic if the voters get to decide. If those in charge get to decide, it’s undemocratic, like the DNC.

Here’s a quick guide on how Democracy works. If you read it first, we can both save time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

I literally just described is as an unfair primary where the DNC had exert influence to get their candidates to win. If you are going to ignore what I wrote, I’m not going to waste my time with you

The Twilight Zone episode was Shatner, the Twilight Zone movie was Lithgow. Both are great and worth a watch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightmare_at_20,000_Feet

• Citation needed

You mean the same Democrats that refuse to have an actual democratic primary? The ones that openly said in court that they rigged things in favor of their preferred candidates? Yes, they are hurting democracy.

Yes, people ended up voting for Hillary and Biden after the DNC tipped the scales in favor of Biden and Hillary. Maybe the DNC should give him an equal opportunity.

It’s almost like they were, until the Democrats put their fingers on the scale. Weird how that turned out.

Not usually. I don’t typically look too much at the instances I’m interacting on to know if they care about reports or not.

Did he say that? I remember him saying the opposite: “Nothing would fundamentally change”

Anyways, the point I’m making is that your experience was just being unlucky with the quality of the professors you got and the style of teaching they favored.

I think the problem is that experience is pretty common (at leat for my experience in the US). I only learned to love math later in life because I started getting interested in physics, and then I realized that math wasn’t rote memorization.

I generally tag people who are being shitty. It’s totally fine if they disagree with me about things, or downvote me or whatever. But if they just insult others, or openly lie/mislead, or yell at others without bringing an actual argument, then they start getting tags. After enough tags, they get blocked.

The good news is, you have no tags! :)

I’ve heard it’s where all of the Reddit exiles signed up. I have no idea if it’s true or not, but it sounds plausible. I remember when people pointed out factually inconvenient things about Biden on Reddit, they’d get downvote-bombed.

Remember when they got mad after Trump said “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose any voters”? They said it was cult-like behavior by his followers.

But when Biden bombs children, or backs a genocide, it’s somehow not cult-like behavior to keep supporting him.

awesome, I’ll check that out

I know a few teachers who use cursive when they have students take notes to other teachers. That way the students can’t read them

https://archive.is/VBn5c

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/15/well/live/guidelines-iud-insertion-pain-management.html

It’s insane to me that this just now came out