

I wonder if they meant because once this is over, no one will be able to find jobs.
I wonder if they meant because once this is over, no one will be able to find jobs.
Hitler was way smarter.
Would he, though?
Ok
Yes, it’s first line of the article/summary.
This is such a weird reply.
So was the other message I replied to.
Joel?
But…you can’t imagine a case where a notoriously private couple might not get visitors for a week? Visitors who wouldn’t just leave when no one answered the door, assuming they weren’t home or in the shower or something?
Also, he was found to have not eaten recently, hut no indications of being dehydrated.
“Successful” would include “profitable”.
I’m only half-awake, but I can’t think of what the right word would be either :)
You had a good point thought, you dont just give those away and let them know to fix it…!
I mean, the head of the IRS absolutely could be a hero. Fighting billionaire tax fraud would be heroic for example. They were definitely starting that up again, until the corrupt executive coup started.
This was the head of HR though.
Hmmm yeah, he’s “only” worth about $85M, so low/mid-upper class
I’m definitely getting more and more hesitant to exercise free speech, due to rapidly increasing government monitoring and corruption.
In this case the best one-word description IMO is probably “corruption”. Followed by “fascism” or similar.
What’s happening here is straight up, massive corruption, which definitely isn’t limited to capitalism.
But of course it’s a lot of things.
Oh, you’re one of those.
OK, blocked. Bye!
But that’s not what a honeypot is
But that’s not lawfully and the original comment doesn’t make sense otherwise.
Anyone not already second guessing would be fools.