

The whole idea behind the formation of the EU, which the US helped push for, was to squash this rivalry
But does the US want to maintain this system now? Perhaps they see the EU as a competitor and want it to gridlock, or even fragment.
That works if you do it once. If you keep doing it you lose credibility.
What I understand is that the consciousness requirement was placed so that people could verify that the animal was healthy and had not been ill-treated. Stunning is allowed after examination and before slaughter. Meat certified by the UK Halal Food Authority, for example, is from stunned animals.
CW: death of animal
There are a few requirements for meat to be halal, such as killing humanely (usually by a single stroke of a sharp knife), and making sure the animal is healthy and has not been ill-treated. Some say that this improves the taste, as frightened animals produce lactic acid, which sours and hardens the meat.
Didn’t the catboy thing come from anime?
Britain, Vancouver, Central Europe
Why not have ‘the shadow cast by the Eiffel Tower’ and ‘countries that drive on the right’ while we’re at it?
Fires don’t care about their feelings.
On paper, Pakistan will only use nukes if it is getting invaded and overrun, and India (and China) has a ‘no first use’ rule. More importantly, neither country has deployed nukes.