Ⓐ☮☭

  • 15 Posts
  • 582 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle


  • I dont think the whole web being like the fediverse is feasible

    It does not need to be. “Whole web” being a certain way almost implies it all follows the same standards from which point the people who set and develop those standards become the centralised authority.

    I like to think of the internet as simply a carrier of digital information. This can be any information. My vpn tunnel is just as much a part of the whole as a public website.

    The way i envision a positive evolution is that more people get involved in running their own network, for themselves, their family, their neighbourhood, a global community they are a part of.

    They can use the activitypub protocol, a selfmade protocol or any other they want. The only thing that matters is that the people who need and use the digital information can use it.

    The public internet dominated by large players will still exist but it will be (and actually already is) a small portion of everything we use the web for.




  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyztoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldsparkle icon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    People want the means to survive, grow and live in comfort. Just because we live in a capitalist dystopia does not mean the current requirement to live is what we want.

    If you have all of those and somehow cant find a passion that creates value i rather have you sit at home and do nothing because i have no expectation the work will be of any quality.

    Of course you wouldn’t sit at home and do nothing because that would be boring and people with the means to be mentally and physically healthy expect more of themselves.

    Point to the “dirty” jobs like swiping the streets and i’ll point to the volunteers doing a much better job keeping things clean then the career people. Passion and the inherent desire to make things better is everything.

    All the important cyber security stuff is build on free software nowadays, because it is superior software in every possible way you can measure.








  • All materials obtained just to turn it into jewellery is loss yes.

    Mine is a gold alloy rather then pure and i am very fond of it. I derive pleasure from it everyday while the total loss was significantly less than the one in Bezos marriage.

    We also had an engagement ring which has an industrial rock because no way where we going to waste our limited money on a real diamond.

    All rings combined costs less than having a birth in a US hospital.

    Both rings were still a loss to the planet, just like almost every novelty i own and many things i consume. Staying alive is a destructive action and all humans cause loss. That is normal and ok. What is not ok is not being aware/inconsiderate of it.

    We should all strive to create the least amount of loss we are aware off and my older self having grown significantly then when i married would love a ring made from recycled computer metals which now often end up on a landfill.



  • So really that ring is pure loss.

    No one owned that gem when it was just sitting in the ground. It took millions of years to create.

    Some capitalism claimed it when one of his workers mined it. Calculated how much energy and labor it has costs to obtain it.

    Then sold it for a massive markup compared to their own costs.

    The machines have spend energy to get it (loss)

    The workers spend life time and life energy to get it (loss)

    Bezos his works spend their life time and energy to make him the money he now loses on this ring. (Loss)

    The planet lost one of its rare gems. (Loss)

    No lives are going to be saved using that rock, its not going to be used for breakthrough science, its not in a museum where we the people can admire our planet and learn from the its amazing processes. (No profit)

    Instead its to decorate a hand so one person can be perceived as having value. Ironic.




  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyztoScience Memes@mander.xyzGravity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Caused” was not a good term but like i said i made that comment half jokingly

    I find that almost everything can be boiled down to just be a display of quantum mechanics which is why id place it as more fundamental.

    I cant really say that about gravity/spacetime though. Maybe someday we do find that it also is but for now it seems to be distinct.


  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyztoScience Memes@mander.xyzGravity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Thanks for a well written reply.

    Though i still dont quite get this

    the electromagnetic force itself doesn’t “arise” from quantum mechanics, and you can explain things like electromagnets and a lot of common electric circuits (until you need a transistor) quite well without considering quantum mechanics.

    You seem to say if we can explain x without y then y cannot be fundamental to x.

    But can electromagnetism at all emerge if the quantum mechanics dont exist to emerge things like magnetism and some of the behavior of electrons?