if you look at it in macro, you could argue this is true, but this is basically just strictly related to econ governance, which makes sense because it’s the most functional form of economy lmao.
If you look at social governance there are VAST differences.
Social governance in the US is mostly window dressing. The class oppression is the same, dems just don’t pretend poor whites are a higher class than other minorities. To the dem or republican leadership your gender, sex, nor race really matter. As long as you’re not trying to remove the class divide then you’re good enough. Even the most racist republican would happily go along with a black president as long as said president didn’t threaten the economic order. Its why Obama was allowed to do as much as he did.
if you look at it in macro, you could argue this is true, but this is basically just strictly related to econ governance, which makes sense because it’s the most functional form of economy lmao.
If you look at social governance there are VAST differences.
Social governance in the US is mostly window dressing. The class oppression is the same, dems just don’t pretend poor whites are a higher class than other minorities. To the dem or republican leadership your gender, sex, nor race really matter. As long as you’re not trying to remove the class divide then you’re good enough. Even the most racist republican would happily go along with a black president as long as said president didn’t threaten the economic order. Its why Obama was allowed to do as much as he did.