• Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    You can poison the well:

    • Glaze makes it near impossible for gen AI to reproduce your style!
    • Nightshade makes it near impossible for gen AI to recognise what’s in your art and learn from it!
  • Mortoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s interesting that this is a style that’s relatively easy to get AI to output, yet AI slop is instantly recognizable while this actually looks like good art.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      For now. I worry it will get to a point where we won’t be able to tell.

    • GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I had some fun with Bing AI…

      Draw me an illustration of the following. A lady with pink, long flowy hair holding up a blank sign. She is wearing an off-white silky gown. The background are some pastel coloured pink lilies, and sky in the colour of pastel blue, yellow, and green.

      Sign should be above her head. The lady has Caucasian features.

      She should have a face that looks angry and determined to right a wrong. Also, use some bold outlines.

      Sure, it doesn’t exactly have character like the one in the OP.

      But I also put almost no effort in prompting (less than a minute). And Bing (Dall-E) isn’t exactly the pinnacle of image generation AI. And the whole tech will only get better by time.

      The problem is that it doesn’t even have to be “very good”; the majority of people are entirely happy with “good enough”. It’s not hard to imagine how the whole thing will threaten and disrupt so many industries.

      • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Compounding on the “good enough,” i feel like when someone reaches out for a commissioned piece, they have an idea in their mind what they want, but are terrible at explaining it. So what the artist creates might not be what they wanted, with AI, they can make a prompt, see that their explanation sucked, and change their explanation in faster cycle time

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        the majority of people are entirely happy with “good enough”.

        Are they really? I’m constantly disappointed by how my fellow humans vote in democracies, so maybe I’m just that out of touch. I thought most people would want to know what they were looking at was the product of human will and effort. Is that not your impression?

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Technology has always been pushing people of average skill to move forward and find new things. The effort to stop AI from coming after this medium are already lost. Now would not be a great time to bank on an entire career based of drawing art in a style that AI can do. But perhaps there is a form of art that AI can not soon replicate.

    There will always be a market for truly expert craftspeople and artists, however, and art as a hobby or personal interest will never cease.

    Edit: the reaction is a bit fascinating to me and I’m trying to understand. The ATM machine reduced our need for bank tellers. The automatic phone switching network reduced our need for phone operators. E-commerce reduced the need for cashiers. The advent of computers reduced the need for slide rule operators. You can view this as all bad but by being on an internet forum you’re benefitting directly from people having been freed from these jobs and able to pursue other less replaceable jobs.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      “I want computers to do my laundry so I can do art. Instead computers are doing the art.”

      All of this AI stuff would be fine (or at least less bad) if we didn’t live in a capitalist dystopia where people might have their basic needs (food, shelter, etc) threatened so some rich turd can become a little richer.

    • drthunder@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Art is more than a job, it’s one of those fundamentally human things that we all do. Half the value of any form of art is the fact that a person made it and put their thoughts and feelings into it. I can make some guesses about the person who made this by their artistic choices. I’m a musician and when I listen to a song, I like to listen for the artist’s influences, how the guitarist plays a certain note or phrase, etc.

      Probably no one is a bank teller for fun. A lot of the hate for generative AI comes from the broader circumstances around it too. The people making money off it haven’t shown that they value anything besides money and power, it uses an insane amount of energy, etc.