• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Russia has always firmly opposed expansion of NATO, including the missiles and NATO troops that were lined up at their border with Ukraine’s participation.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m pretty sure every country on earth would respond to a hostile force amassing troops & missiles at their border.

        • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The fundamental difference here is between a sovereign nation pursuing defensive alliances versus an aggressive invasion violating international law. Ukraine wasn’t “amassing troops & missiles” at Russia’s border as an hostile threat - it was seeking security guarantees after Russia had already annexed Crimea in 2014 and fomented separatist movements in eastern Ukraine. National sovereignty means countries get to determine their own security arrangements, and Russia’s “security concerns” don’t justify violating Ukraine’s territorial integrity or dictating its foreign policy choices.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not a sovereign nation. The US installed a far-right puppet regime in the 2014 Maidan Coup, which triggered the Crimea invasion.

            Funny that folks who claim to support Ukrainian sovereignty don’t give a shit about them being under a western thumb.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’ve only ever threatened their neighbors during NATO expansion efforts.

          This is abuser logic. “If you would quit misbehaving, then I wouldn’t have to hit you!”