• FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Right, I see the point now. They definitely should’ve worded it differently.

    I don’t know, though, it just seems like it’s likely that the USCCB will be able to get this struck down.

    • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      24 days ago

      Oh they probably will. Especially with this supreme court. Had I made this law I would have specified that anyone covered under (A) cannot get out of their responsibility by citing that they acquired privileged information through a different role. But the damage is done with the wording.