• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    No, unfortunately. The only way to achieve change is to commit a spectacular act of vigilantism or be a billionaire.

    Look at the choices we were given in the last election: two old, publicly cognitively-impaired men, both of whom had four years to demonstrate to great effect that legislating in a way that allows workers to obtain a reasonably good standard of living wasn’t a priority. I realize the Dems switched out their candidate, but the new one said she wouldn’t change anything about the last election, so it’s fair to say she’d have done nothing about poverty too.

    • Lyrl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Fair, thanks for replying. I suspect I am much more worried about deteriorating conditions than you, and that different risk/benefit weighting leads me to different conclusions, but it’s helpful to hear other lines of thinking.

      Also, your serious replies prompted me to comment-stalk you a little, and led me to a few interesting conversations the lemmy algorithm had not otherwise shown me, so thanks for that, too!

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You’re welcome. Thank you for engaging in good faith.

        Thankfully I’m only responsible for myself, so no spouse or kids to worry about, or I might be thinking differently.