• Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Pollock stole the whole idea from an east bloc woman who did “pouring” already.

    Also, the art world in the USA was heavily CIA sponsored in the 50/60 to counter USSR cultural influence.

    In my personal opinion, pollocks work isn’t worth the paint he poured. It’s just based on the idea that if you’re the first to do it, it’s “revolutionary”, which it was for the impressionists and before, but not very much beyond, IMO.

    It also lead to money laundring, and eventually selling a banana scotched to a wall for hundreds of thousands of dollars. That is not art.

    Rant off/ 😱

    • ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hey, I have that banana duct taped in my living room! 🤣

      Art is subjective, always has been. I remember visiting a modern art museum in Germany years ago, and seeing a weed growing at the base of the wall in one of the rooms. Looking closer, I could see the weed was a very lifelike bronze cast, but in that moment the juxtaposition was jarring enough to make me question what art really is. I doubt it will have the same effect on everyone, but for me that was significant. And memorable, as you can see.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sure, but was it art?

        The discussion is endless ofc :-)

        BTW the taped banana comes with instructions on how to replace it when it goes old. I’m sure you are not doing it correctly!! /s