Bluesky, which uses it, has been opened to federation now, and the standard basically just looks better than ActivityPub. Has anyone heard about a project to make a Lemmy-style “link aggregator” service on it?

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    ha, no… bluesky is not open to federation. they control the only router and do not allow connectivity to routers not controlled by them.

    there isnt a single non-bluesky controlled instance that can federate natively with bluesky.

    bluesky is just twitter with a little more user-controllable data sourcing. not that theres anything wrong with that, but its certainly not a part of any federation.

    e. suggested reading: https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yep. What do you think the chances are you could write something that does the job of the router and app view, but in a totally off-standard, more point-to-point way?

          In the meanwhile, it’s just a matter of bridging, I guess.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        And they are either in for one of the following:

        • a $30 Million lesson where they learn that they will have to reinvent ActivityPub in order to be “properly” decentralized
        • a rug pull where they come up with a second relay like Bluesky but fork to give exclusive access for large institutions and the enterprise.
        • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s ridiculous they were asking for $30m to do something that ActivityPub already does. Wasted money that could have gone anywhere else

        • jackalope@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          There are important features that ATPro has that activity pub doesn’t. I’d prefer activity pub be the winner but they really need to improve some things. Namely, identity. Bluesky identity is more portable.

          • dpflug@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Identity was already solved with Zot aka Nomad, which is part of the Fediverse and easier to implement than ATProto.

            It’s mostly been ignored because it’s just not that important to people, apparently.

            • jackalope@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              It’s not implemented in mastodon or lemmy though. I’m not saying it can’t be implemented, but it hasn’t been in any platform.

              • dpflug@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                No, but the software that implements it also implements ActivityPub, so you can get nomadic identity and also still interact with the rest of the Fediverse.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s a good blog post, thanks. I made a quick summery elsewhere in the thread.

      It’s really unfortunate that we’ve ended up with two populated protocols for federation, both of which have a major flaw. In our case, it’s no established support for moving accounts. In theirs, its a component that’s so bulky the federatability is questionable (and no federated DMs).

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        both of which have a major flaw

        What major flaw do you believe ActivityPub has?

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I mean, it doesn’t have to be part of the standard (it could just as well be Lemmy-specific), but no built-in way to move accounts sucks. AT protocol provides a nice little solution for that.

        • Pamasich@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          They mentioned the flaws of both platforms.

          In our case, it’s no established support for moving accounts.

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    looks better

    What do you mean?

    than ActivityPub

    ActivityPub is decentralised. AT has a centralised index. They’re not comparable.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I didn’t have that one little detail about how demanding a relay is to run. Thankfully, this thread has been illuminating.

      It’s still a bummer that Lemmy doesn’t provide any non-hack way to move your account to a new instance.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 days ago

    the standard basically just looks better

    Place your bets everyone, has OP ever looked at either standard?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Bets all in? Okay:

      spoiler

      I have not looked directly at the AT standard, just the Wikipedia article and some similar high-level explanation.

      Pretty sure I have actually looked at the ActivityPub standard at times, though.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    https://threadsky.app/

    Very slow at the moment, probably due to people looking for Reddit alternatives but was fine couple of weeks ago when I first saw it. Seemed okay if you’re okay with AT Proto (it’s not that decentralised really).

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Really? In what way?

      Digital identities being cryptographic and independent of any one instance is huge all on it’s own. The rest of it I understand less clearly, but it looks pretty modular.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Thank you!

          TL;DR, the relay bit works as a completely connected network topology, and has the associated quadratic growth issues, which renders it, like you said, hard to host.

          Also nasty: Direct messages are just not federated.

          Other things are or were at the time of writing janky, but nothing else is quite that egregious. The author is working on a separate project, and recommends this idea as a solution for portable identity on ActivityPub; here’s what “object capability” means in the context.

      • ericjmorey@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The data is not centralized, but everyone is using the same aggravation aggregation service (indexer) to access the data.

      • timconspicuous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        The main difference between Threadsky and Frontpage is that Threadsky is just yet another Bluesky re-skin, it’s just regular Bluesky posts presented in a reddit-like format, whereas Frontpage has its own dedicated lexicon and doesn’t ingest the Bluesky firehose at all. I think Frontpage is really neat, but it has been shown little love unfortunately, it hasn’t meaningfully changed in months.

  • egerlach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    There was a good discussion online between Christine Lemmer-Webber, one of the editors of the ActivityPub W3C Standard, and Bryan Newbold, protocol engineer at BlueSky.

    These are long reads. But they are worth reading. Christine and Bryan agree that ATProto and ActivityPub have different design goals and so what you get from “federation” with each is different. ATProto makes a centralized index of the entire system possible, at the cost of relying on very few (practically likely one) centralized providers.

    As a result, the Lemmy ecosystem, as it exists today, wouldn’t be possible with ATProto. It would probably look more like Reddit, but with a “credible exit” possible as a defense against enshittification.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Leaving aside all the work they did making an alternative more to their liking, that kind of implies it’s like a light switch, and it’s not.

    • jackalope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I wish they would but also ATPro has features that activity pub doesn’t, ones which I think activity pub needs to adopt if it is to stay relevant

  • Oskar@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    If Bluesky becomes federated with multiple instances, it will be just as impossible to enter as ActivityPub-based services apparently are since instance-selection is a blocker.

    RIght?

    ;)

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Yep, probably. People are just going to have to get used to it to certain degree, and to a certain degree there’s going to be .world-type instances that act as a user-friendly default.

      There’s other issues at play, of course, which is more why I asked.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      There’s been a definite tinge of ideology or at least gatekeeping to some of these responses, but that’s to be expected. FOSS has always had a streak of it.

      It’s a bit ironic to use ActivityPub to say ActivityPub has no real applications, though.