• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Do you know if the CMHC analysis considers decreasing the housing costs by increasing supply till the market is forced to decrease prices, or whether it’s considering public intervention like building low cost housing and selling it at cost?

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m under the impression that it’s simply increasing supply to flood the market and meet demand. I don’t believe that CMHC analysis included price controls. It’s been a while since I read it though.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Assuming that they’ve only looked at that, then by introducing useful, at-cost units on the market (rental or real estate), it might be possible to depress prices through fewer units. E.g. units like the 2-3 bedroom ones in cheap, brown multistorey buildings the CMHC used to build before condos became popular. A smaller flood of such units would bid prices down directly.

        • sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Definitely, but I don’t think the CMHC study distinguishes between unit types, nor do housing start stats. I believe we had 225k starts for the last couple years. We need to increase those numbers dramatically to improve affordability.