Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19
-
AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine
-
The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”
Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.
-
The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995
Hello, you’re attacking the people coming at you from your side. I was quite polite with you and you chose this shit instead.
You sure about that? “We love you, you’re very special” are some of the words Trump has said to his followers.
I’m literally here for the sincerity and honesty and I’m seeing none of that. You’ve literally sowed nothing but distrust in me in these few short interactions. If that’s your aim good job you did it.
Show me where you are discussing Malala on social media. I am.
If you can’t “see it”, that’s because you are looking in the wrong places.
Here you go: https://mastodon.social/tags/SupportMalala
I literally came to your community to read your shit, genius. I came here to find out what you were talking about and I got berated instead and turned away from the content. How’s that for your precious media ecology.
I literally asked you to help me see it and you berated me. I’m definitely asking the wrong person, no doubt.
More mocking, mockery: https://mastodon.social/tags/MockMockMockery
Am I wrong, though. You don’t seem to grasp the meaning of what you’re saying.
Yes, you are wrong.
I’m saying study Marshall McLuhan, James Joyce, Neil Postman. I understand the meaning of what I’m saying about Lemmy.
Rhetorical question, my dude. Keep up.
Go study the basics on gender, please. It’ll give you something productive to do rather than spam your pointless little quotes like people care.
That’s the problem. People go so far out of their way to make sure Vlad Putin, Elon Musk, and Donald Trump are what people care about.
Why isn’t Malala on the front page of Lemmy at least once a week? Because she isn’t entertaining. She isn’t thrilling like Elon Musk and Donald Trump. She is “pointless” like the quotes you avoid.
The problem is that your communication style is ineffective, unnecessarily defensive and combative. Stop kidding yourself and making up excuses. So much for a media ecologist being blinded by their own subject. But blame Putin!
I have yet to mention Malala and it’s the third time you bring her up. More diversions away from my fixation?