Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19
-
AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine
-
The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”
Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.
-
The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995
Yes, about the context of this conversation.
You have context blindness. Context Blindness: Digital Technology and the Next Stage of Human Evolution (Understanding Media Ecology, 10) - Are people with autism giving us a glimpse into our future human condition? Could we be driving our own evolution with our technology and, in fact, be witnessing the beginning of the next stage of human evolution? The thesis at the center of this book is that since we have delegated the ability to read context to contextual technologies such as social media, location, and sensors, we have become context blind. Since context blindness―or caetextia in Latin―is one of the most dominant symptoms of autistic behavior at the highest levels of the spectrum, people with autism may indeed be giving us a peek into our human condition soon. We could be witnessing the beginning of the next stage of human evolution―Homo caetextus. With increasingly frequent floods and fires and unbearably hot summers, the human footprint on our planet should be evident to all, but it is not because we are context blind. We can now see and feel global warming. We are witnessing evolution in real-time and birthing our successor species. Our great-grandchildren may be a species very distinct from us. This book is a must for all communication and media studies courses dealing with digital technology, media, culture, and society. And a general reading public concerned with the polarized public sphere, difficulties in sustaining democratic governance, rampant conspiracies, and phenomena such as cancel culture and the need for trigger warnings and safe spaces, will find it enlightening.
…
Somehow you think the comments don’t have to do with the postings and community context.
About your irrational reaction, omg, you’re not serious. lol Look at the shit you’re typing now implying I’m autistic. LOL
No, you’re also terrible at communicating.
I’m not implying that. The book is about “media ecology”
Lemmy is. But you don’t grasp “media ecology”.
REPEATING: Context Blindness: Digital Technology and the Next Stage of Human Evolution (Understanding Media Ecology, 10) -
And you don’t grasp queer theory so you confuse it with word play, so what.
But please, tell me about how one “transgenders” into a different gender.
You can say those words on Lemmy computers all you want, but I perfectly understand homosexuality and the history of governments and religions forming organized efforts against sexual behaviors / expressions / practices.
you don’t grasp “media ecology”. You think because of a few messages on Lemmy that you understand my life experience and things I have actually done in my 55 years alive. You have a problem of media ecology of Lemmy message sysems.
Why, because you suck dick? Welcome to the club. And transgender? Anybody “transgendering” today?
TOPIC: Billionaires met in November 2013 and one month later announced in December 2013 that they were going to troll the entire world (over gender) to wage war against Ukraine - Operation Matthew 4:19
“troll the entire world”
In 2013, they asked everyone with money and power to join in with Trolling. You know what Elon Musk did after finding out about this Kremlin / Russian / Putin call? He purchased Twitter. He “troll the entire world”
And you seem to adore and love the bullshit. I do not. I am not here for your word games.
Where is the explicit mention of gender in all of this? Please clarify. Sorry I got a little fixated in not getting a basic answer.
That’s egomania induced by Lemmy media ecology crisis. And it isn’t “a little”, you are extremely fixated.
My communications is fine. Malala’s communications is fine. The !ClownPopulation@lemm.ee in the reading / audience is the problem.
Half of that description is about posing autism as the next, real-time evolutionary milestone. Do you not read what you copy & paste? Can you not narrow it down to avoid ambiguities? Can you stop blaming others for your failure to communicate effectively?
It isn’t my failure. It’s a problem of Lemmy itself. That’s the point of the entire book. Go read the book and stop commenting to me on Lemmy electric media systems.
These problems aren’t about me as a single person. It’s not me, Stephen Alfred Gutknecht, my personal fault that people adore and listen to Donald Trump, accept what Rupert Murdoch’s media systems (Fox News HDTV) say as reality and and avoid Malala !Malala@lemm.ee
People mention Palestine and Israel every day on Lemmy and Bluesky, and nobody mentions Malala and what she has to say about terrorism and conflicts. It is not the fault of Stephen Alfred Gutknecht (me) that you are all attracted to Elon Musk, Kremlin simulacra, and Donald Trump White House antics.
Go read the Wiki page you linked about gender and hop onto the recommended one about sexual orientation. Then I’ll consider the book.
I’m not the one confused how to process information. You are.
You don’t seem to know what the words you put in your titles mean and get immediately defensive when asked about them. Funny how that works. Kinda hypocritical, ngl.
No, you don’t understand media ecology. You need to study James Joyce, Marshall McLuhan, Neil Postman, and everything to do with the metaphor of “The Tower of Babel”.
Bible verse John 1:1 over 2000 years ago: I’ve been teaching about this topic over on Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/tags/FWakeJohnOneOne