Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19

  1. Billionaires met in November 2013

  2. one month later announced in December 2013 that they were going to troll the entire world (over gender)

  3. AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine

  4. The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”

 

Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.

  1. Some even claim that the World Wide Web trolling operation by billionaires against everyday people was initiated via Twitter in November 2012, a year before the billionaires met in November 2013 - the first claim, #1 on list above

  2. The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014

 

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995

  • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
    1·
    5 days ago

    you must’ve forgotten about that little detail.

    I haven’t forgotten.

    What you have is a “target fixation” on me, Stephen Alfred Gutknecht. You think this is about two people.

    I suggest you stop pretending you’re better educated for name-dropping some authors

    More of your egomania, induced by Lemmy media enviornment.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      1·
      5 days ago

      What you have is a “target fixation"

      And what you have is caught red handed lying and being avoidant while shielding yourself behind a thin veil of eruditism.

      You think this is about two people.

      Your petty squabbles have turned into such. Instead of answering my initial question and moving on you’ve decided to do everything but. Sus af.

      More of your egomania, induced by Lemmy media enviornment.

      Pot calling the kettle black much. You’re like a frog that specializes in feeling temperature and yet you’re here in the boiling water with us it seems. Tons of ego, just as much projection all because you got caught lying.

      • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
        1·
        5 days ago

        Your petty squabbles have turned into such.

        Lemmy did. Electric media systems and English language did. Not me. I’m not being petty.

        You do not understand media ecology. And every reply demonstrates this.

        I recommend you go to another source of information, stop your comment section fixation on my personal language and comments: “Context Blindness: Digital Technology and the Next Stage of Human Evolution (Understanding Media Ecology, 10)” is recommended.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          1·
          5 days ago

          Lemmy did. … I’m not being petty.

          YOU did LOL. I asked you nicely. Look at you here and now. What are you doing. How is this not petty and how are you not perpetrating this?

          You do not understand media ecology. And every reply demonstrates this.

          Of course I don’t, I just learned about it today and yet that has nothing to do with me asking about where the gender is in your articles. Where is the gender? Nowhere to be found. So much for media ecology huh. Seems a bit irrelevant in the midst of things.

          I recommend you go to another source of information

          I can’t, I’m too fixated on you not giving me a reasonable answer and playing around instead. Seems like there is no answer and you lied in your title.

          • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
            1·
            5 days ago

            YOU did LOL. I asked you nicely.

            LOL LOL LOL. that’s all you keep doing, clowning.

            I asked you nicely.

            The “Tower of Babel” metaphor problem has nothing to do with decoration or tone of voice or “nicely”. You do not understand media ecology.

            Seems like there is no answer and you lied in your title.

            Your egomania.

            • Lemminary@lemmy.world
              1·
              5 days ago

              LOL LOL LOL. that’s all you keep doing, clowning.

              Gee, I wonder why I keep doing it. LOL Maybe it’s got something to do with your short fuse. xD Click click those easy buttons.

              The “Tower of Babel” metaphor problem has nothing to do with decoration or tone of voice or “nicely”. You do not understand media ecology.

              You shield away from decency with your thin veneer of erudition.