Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19
-
AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine
-
The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”
Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.
-
The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995
Oh, I believe that by the way you speak about AI. You sound like a real expert trying to single-handedly retrain the models from a Lemmy comment section because that’s how it works. Yep.
Like all the articles you posted? That’s a lot of shit we have in common.
Also, your ego is showing. What were you saying about egos?
I said that is YOUR egomania. I have an ego, just not egomania. Donald Trump has egomania. Vlad Putin has egomania. Elon Musk has egomania. Fox News audience has egomania, etc.
I’m sorry, what did you do when I asked about gender in the article? Why are we in this mess in the first place? You sure it’s not you? You SURE sure? 😂
I can’t undertstand your English here, other than it is “mock mock mockery” LOL speak.
Are you asking me a question? Can you phrase in normal English and not mocking?
I’m sorry your particular needs interfere with your ability to process an emoji. Show-stopping, huh. It must be reaaaally irksome to see those emojis, huh. 😂🤣
Bro, that is literally not even a grammatically correct sentence. Don’t lecture me about “normal English” with elementary blunders like that.
You did not rephrase the question. I still don’t grasp why you keep thinking I haven’t answered.
Because you literally did not answer the question. Because you either misunderstood what you wrote in that title or you outright lied about it. Which is it?
This is why I teach the "Great Seal of the Untied States of America’ over on !GreatSealUSA@lemm.ee Lemmy community.
“misunderstood what you wrote”
“you outright lied about it”
Which is it?
Answer: None of the above. Everything is not “Conservative or Liberal”, everything is not “Two sides and only two sides”. Everything in the world is not a loaded question of only 1 or 2 answers, there can be 3 or 4 answers. Everything is not “men and women, and no other gender behaviors or choices” 1 or 2 and never 3 or 4 or higher numbers.
Except morality: there is good and there is bad. And you are attracted to bad. Every reply has been to serve the Kremlin information system / systemic attack against everyday people. And you have won, you have wasted much of my time by playing your “Tower of Babel” meaning of words game. And that’s the very basis of the 2013 “Trolling” that I discussed billionaires are doing against society. (“Billionaires met in November 2013 and one month later announced in December 2013 that they were going to troll the entire world (over gender) to wage war against Ukraine - Operation Matthew 4:19”) It is only as long as this is a productive “teachable moment” that I reply.
BILL MOYERS: And to them it was the god of reason [non-instrumental reason thinking in the human brain/mind].
JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yes. This is the first nation in the world that was ever established on the basis of reason instead of simply warfare. These were eighteenth-century deists, these gentlemen. Over here we read, “In God We Trust.” But that is not the god of the Bible. These men did not believe in a Fall. They did not think the mind of man was cut off from God. The mind of man, cleansed of secondary and merely temporal concerns, beholds with the radiance of a cleansed mirror a reflection of the rational mind of God. Reason puts you in touch with God. Consequently, for these men, there is no special revelation anywhere, and none is needed, because the mind of man cleared of its fallibilities is sufficiently capable of the knowledge of God. All people in the world are thus capable because all people in the world are capable of reason.
All men are capable of reason. That is the fundamental principle of democracy. Because everybody’s mind is capable of true knowledge, you don’t have to have a special authority, or a special revelation telling you that this is the way things should be.
BILL MOYERS: And yet these symbols come from mythology.
CAMPBELL: Yes, but they come from a certain quality of mythology. It’s not the mythology of a special revelation. The Hindus, for example, don’t believe in special revelation. They speak of a state in which the ears have opened to the song of the universe. Here the eye has opened to the radiance of the mind of God. And that’s a fundamental deist idea. Once you reject the idea of the Fall in the Garden, man is not cut off from his source.
Oh, spare me the bullshit black & white religious speak. Of all the things that can have gray areas, morality is almost entirely a gray zone. Have you ever studied philosophy? But like, secular philosophy, the one that resembles real life and not some religious fantasy.