Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19
-
AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine
-
The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”
Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.
-
The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995
Oh, was it not your autism that makes you automatically correct? Damn, I was expecting you to whip it out again as if it means anything. Maybe try mentioning some other unrelated thing as the cause, maybe that’ll work
HELLOOOO KETTLE. lmao
Yep, everyone. I’m seeing it right now.
It works for your information warfare methods on Lemmy. To do ANYTHING but discuss the billionaire topic.
Much like doing ANYTHING to avoid the non-existent gender topic in those articles.
Again, you have a literacy problem. I suggest Marshall McLuhan and Neil Postman as teachers.
The article clearly discusses gender topic. Vladimir Putin is calling on the conservatives of the world to unite—behind him.The Kremlin leader’s full-throated defense of Russia’s “traditional values” and his derision of the West’s “genderless and infertile” liberalism in his annual state-of-the-nation address last week was just the latest example of Putin attempting to place himself at the vanguard of a new “Conservative International.”
Really I can not determine if you are just being an agent to serve the Kremlin / Billionaire systems. There really are people who have a literacy problem as bad as yours, and that’s the only reason I haven’t abandoned this thread.
You’re the one confusing gender with gender roles and sexual orientation, hon. You have a problem sticking to the facts. Don’t try it, you know it’s not true.
NO, I’m not. The word “Gender” is right in Putin’s 2013 speech. “Genderless”.
You have a literacy problem. I suggest teachers Neil Postman and Marshall McLuhan.
No, I have a problem of information warfare tactics being used against me by a Lemmy computer user who keeps replying to waste my time. A form of harassment and “denial of service” to exhaust me / distract me from more important work. Very commonly used on social media in year 2024 and year 2025 across all platforms.
Get the FULL quote from the article. Note how genderless and infertile modifies liberalism to mean neutered, ineffective, incapable, and amorphous. It means decadent and weak, referencing the apparent obsession with LGBTQ+ rights and feminism rather than strong families and national identity that Russia pretends to champion.
It does not mean gender as in gender roles or gender identity specifically, which is why I asked in the first place before you went apeshit. So much for media illiteracy, huh.
E: It’s “genderless and infertile” both modifying liberalism, not just genderless.
More mocking. “Mock mock mockery” information warfare that is saturating society in year 2024 and year 2025. https://mastodon.social/tags/MockMockMockery
Your entire reply is only “English literacy”, I said you have “media ecology literacy”. these are two very different things.
In response to your misunderstanding of what I meant, I created a new Lemmy community !MediaEcology@lemm.ee
“Media Ecology” literacy is not “English prose literacy”
The whole context of the posting is the repeat emphasis on timing. “November 2013”, “December 2013”, “Ukraine War start” (February 2014, after the New Years, typical in businessmen word)… and “Internet Research Agency” going online in 2013 even BEFORE the “November 2013” meeting.
That’s the CORE concept of the posting emphasis. Time, how events were lined up like bowling pins by Putin’s Kremlin. They (“Internet Research Agency”) was already attacking ALL people via World Wide Web with Cambridge Analytica + Vlad Surkov behavior patterns and proving their systems BEFORE Donald Trump even went to Moscow in November, and before Putin announced a month later in December.
Context: Timing of year 2013, the months of 2013, and start of Ukraine war 2014
Go BEYOND the context of a single 2013 article and list above to VALIDATE how Russia and other conservatives have been behaving since that meeting.
The ruling is the latest step in a decade-long crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights in Russia under President Vladimir Putin, who has emphasized “traditional family values” during his 24 years in power. - November 2023. EMPHASIS: “a decade-long crackdown” - which means year 2013. See how there is evidence that 2013 was a big turning point in “cracking down” on it in Russia?
“in 2014, President Obama signed Executive Order 13672, adding “gender identity” to the categories protected against discrimination in hiring in the federal civilian workforce and both “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” to the categories protected against discrimination” <<<<< in RESPONSE to this March 2013 onward IRA attacks on WWW, and the November 2013 Moscow sex show, and the December 2013 announcement by Russia, the United States Government took actions to RESIST Putin’s Kremlin.
I suggest you study more about both media ecology !MediaEcology@lemm.ee and information warfare, the “Internet Research Agency” history and !HybridWarLost@lemm.ee
You have literally said I have media literally problems in general. Don’t try it when I got your message history right here.
Well, it most certainly is when you fail to parse an English sentence and you blame your misunderstanding on me. 😂
Yeah, and the whole context of my comment was about your inclusion of gender in the title and the body of the post. What is your reasoning? Why is that so hard to answer? Where is your 3rd or 4th alternative explanation for this? Why are you explaining something I did not ask about? Why are you talking to me about media ecology at all instead of answering the question? Sus af.