• Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Katie Porter is one of the very few good guys. She’d be a terrific governor for California, so I expect the Democratic Party will do all they can to oppose her.

    • andyburke@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If she isn’t the Dem nominee she should still run. I think we could put a progressive in here in CA.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I hate the top-two jungle primary. Damnit, if I want to vote for the person with no chance at winning, I shouldn’t have to write them in! I’d honestly much prefer to see some flavor of ranked choice vote implemented (not trying to kick off an argument about RCV flavors, just using it as a blanket term).

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Harris is going to run and don’t you know this was her promised consolation prize. So sorry progressives, maybe in a 100 years when everyone in line in front of you dies?

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, I remember it being pitched right after the election. Idk, if Kamala actually runs on a progressive platform and doesn’t redshift like she did late in the election, I might consider her seriously.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          She’s incapable of running a progressive campaign. You have to actually be Progressive to do that.