I recently came across a brutal review from a devoted Christian on goodreads of a novel called Insane Entities, he called it blasphemous and asked for it to be removed. The novel takes religious concepts and twists them into something… unsettling. It got me thinking—why do people react so strongly when a book dares to reinterpret sacred ideas?

One scene in the book hit me particularly hard: a character with three eyes, one weeping while the other two smile as he knots a corpse like a bag. It’s gruesome, sure, but the hidden symbolism makes it even darker—it reflects the Christian Trinity, with Jesus suffering while the Father and Holy Spirit remain distant. It’s a powerful and eerie take on an old concept.

It seems like books that tackle religious themes in unconventional ways always get the harshest criticism. Do you think that’s because people fear reinterpretation, or is it just resistance to any challenge of belief?

  • Karry@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
    1·
    4 days ago

    I can see how the scene might come off as body horror, but as the story progresses, the layers of symbolism become clearer. The three eyes and the way the character interacts with the corpse are definitely unsettling, but they take on a deeper meaning as the events unfold. Without giving too much away, the connection to the Christian Trinity becomes a central theme that challenges the viewer’s understanding of suffering, presence, and absence. The Father and Holy Spirit’s seeming detachment plays into a broader commentary that unpacks the way suffering and divine roles are perceived.

    As for the concept of faith, I agree with you—faith can be a powerful anchor or a delusion, depending on how it’s wielded. The more we dig into these ideas, the more we realize how much people shape their beliefs to align with what they feel is most comforting, even if it’s not supported by tangible reality.