• drolex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t this, at least partly, a design issue? Game designers create their games without concern about the economical side of the problem. They create astounding little bits and pieces to make the game desirable but a lot of this could be simplified without sacrificing the mechanics. The dice are a prime example…

    It’s a lot like what happened in the video games and the rift that appeared between AAA games and indie developers.

    A lot of the games I possess are beautiful but have a ludicrous amount of accessory stuff. Eventually it gets lost and replaced by coins and painted pieces of wood without making them worse.

    I suspect that until now all these tidbits were a great way to justify the high price of the games.

  • suoko@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    That stinks…

    Scyte is 90€ but if I printed it all at home (printer+3d printer) it would probably be 20€. A rough version of it, sure, but 20€.

    Make it serial in a factory.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Quite a few publishers have written about their costs and how the tariffs impact them. The actual cost of a $90 game is something like $15, and the rest is labor, distribution costs, and profit. I personally think the distribution costs are way too high and could stand to drop a lot, but I don’t know the details well enough to comment. Regardless, there’s no reasonable way to drop the manufacturing costs significantly.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re only considering material cost, not time cost of employing someone to operate the machines. Also your system is not really scalable - it would take a long time per unit, making the labour cost even more significant per unit. There’s also R&D, distribution, marketing, etc. all before any profit is made. Also, as you mention, the quality of 3D printed pieces would be much poorer.

      • suoko@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I find board games simply overpriced, they’re mostly paper and plastic, and r&d is now much reduced, since 90% of new games simply a mix of already published games with nicer drawings.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Well yeah, 90% of the market is overpriced crap - that’s not unique to boardgames, although like you say it’s understandble how when the material cost can be low. But there are some game makers that do really make the effort, and in particular when I looked up what Scythe is and all the pieces it comes with I feel it’s probably not too unreasonable to ask a higher retail price (although I saw them available for much less also).