• KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Excuse me? Are you saying using guard discovery is a backdoor someone gave to the government? I mean, you can think whatever, but the technology isn’t really… backdoorable? It doesn’t make sense in the context. Where will the backdoor lead? It has no where to go.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      (I am a different person, not arguing anything about this particular vulnerability or the government’s funding of Tor.)

      I think you’re defining backdoor too literally. I get your point, but colloquially it just means to get something nefarious in. If someone is saying “the government has a backdoor in an encryption algorithm” it would mean they believe the government has a vulnerability in that allows them to easily break the encryption, not necessarily a separate “door” or something.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah the government has an institutional thing I forget what it is called, with massive amount of known exploits. That’s not backdoors. A backdoor is a “planted” exploit, not a discovered exploit. It makes no sense to call all exploits backdoors.

    • HiroProtagonist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Okay buddy keep it going as long as you need to. You might enjoy Reddit more, it’s a safe space for people who cannot change their opinions. Bye.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why? I am trying to understand what you mean so I can change my opinion. I’m not changing it because you are fuming and escalating the aggression, in fact, that has the exact opposite effect