ngl i feel safer digging through CDs while driving than digging through a music library on some phone touchscreen. probably if i learned to use voice controls i’d feel better about the phone but i’m at that age where i’m comfortable enough with my ways that i’d rather not have to change them.

they probably meant 512 Gb per IC, not per DIMM (which usually has 8-9 DRAM chips).

you’re right about that last part though.

growing long hair as a guy is like joining a brotherhood. i do love that.

i think “autistic” would be perfect, as there’s a reasonable case that Frieren is neurodivergent (at least by human standards).

anyway @jerkface@lemmy.ca, i will tag my posts more once Lemmy has better tagging. right now at the post-level it’s just NSFW or not NSFW, and the sidebar’s pretty clear IMO on where that line’s to be drawn. at the comment level, there’s only block-level spoilers, with no way to spoiler individual words. my honest advice if it bothers you is to get in contact with the devs and discuss better features around that. this isn’t meant as a dismissal: the nice thing about stuff like Lemmy v.s. reddit is that you actually can speak with the devs just by searching the software on GitHub and then joining the chatroom(s) linked from the readme.

it’s a good place to end my scrolling for the day. thanks ❤️

needs a fifth bar for “comfort”. i had the middle one in my living room for week but had to get rid of it because it was the most cramp-inducing TV chair i’ve ever had. bottom one is probably better.

i hope Legless Skank (the punk band) awakens within you a strong passion for self expression

in my head, there’s a direct causal chain:

1. the court presents me with the accusation and the evidence.
2. i declare if the evidence supports the accusation.
3. the judge declares a punishment in response to that verdict.
4. law enforcement delivers the punishment.

if i believe (3) and (4) will function as stated, then it’s equally accurate to say that in step 2 i am deciding whether or not to confiscate $250,000 from this mother and cancel her home internet connection.

but a huge number of people i present this to refuse to admit that equivalence. there is some question about whether weakening the norm might cause more damage than mistreating the mother, but does that even weaken the point? the common answer from those who bring it up is “there’s too much uncertainty to say”: build a complex enough machine, and people are eager to deny the downstream effects of their actions.

(you can overcome most of the degradation-of-norms issue by making this a secret hearing, and still a lot of people will hesitate to admit the equivalence between their verdict in step 2 and the effects of step 3/4)

i’ve had better luck illustrating the point with a less abstract case: the 2000’s called and it’s your turn for jury dury. the case for today is that of a single mother who downloaded some Disney movies off Limewire for her kids to watch so she could get some time to herself to take care of chores.

should the jury find her guilty, you suspect that the judge will fine her $250,000 and cancel her home internet connection. you think such a punishment would do more net harm than good. but you don’t get to decide the punishment (that’s for the judge to announce after the jury deliberates), you just decide the guilty/not-guilty verdict.

you look at the evidence: the mother definitely downloaded those files. what verdict do you deliver the judge?

bzzzt. “single-handedly” might be read as “not a team player”. talk about how you “led a team that performed the upgrade” instead, or if that’s not true, maybe you “worked with stakeholders” (i.e. you texted your roommate “i replaced the light btw”).