When you say “the American public” it could mean a lot of things. The most represented slice of the population, in politics and media, are the billionaires, second to them are the petty privileged white people. Other parts of the US public are deliberately made invisible, but in terms of raw numbers they might be the majority. This numeral majority will only remain invisible if not organised. When cops will start massacring protestors, we won’t be evaluating the opinion of the public, but its level of organising

how do you all differentiate between actual types of people and vague collections of biases?

Not to be that guy but something something dialectical materialism

Probably tankies

All MLs I met irl are fast-life partygoers lmao

Edit : oh wait maybe they meant MLs were ableist idk, they’d also be wrong they’re not more ableist than other leftists if not less

For having had one foot into an org or two I second this, it feels like extraversion is a matter of survival. I’ve got social anxiety which meant basically every common task is out of reach

Sounds like a cold ass take to me, claiming that any kind of recreative activity is counterrevolutionary is pretty unserious in the first place and yes, forcing people to be in a group when they don’t want to is ableist

Incredible lmao thanks for tagging

I feel sympathy because they’re fighting for a good cause despite how the establishment demonizes them but I must admit I don’t understand hunger strikes.

You don’t get any compassion from your enemies, and your allies are already allies. The people in power are participating in the deaths of people at home and around the world, including death by starvation, they don’t give a damn if people starve that’s why they’re here. Do strikers think they are special and will force the starvers to change their genocidal agenda because a student is now doing it to themselves?

I wouldn’t be so harsh if going hungry wasn’t so dangerous. Hunger can inflict lifetime damage on your brain, you can lose critical abilities like speech, sight, reasoning. Losing a limb to kill a fascist id heroic, but hunger strikes don’t kill anyone but the strikers, and they don’t save anyone either. I mean, do they? Maybe they did in some less fascistic regime, but the current US of A? No chance that’s doing anything.

Basically impossible, they’re inherently biased by the data they learn from but once they’re done training there you can’t tinker with the system itself, only try to impose external constraints that have unlimited potential to be breached

Kleya is such a queeeeeen aaaaah

Probably but also yes absolutely right lmao

And they said art is dead

Unironically good advice if you want to be creative

“I see”

Phenomenologist:

The USA has a one-party system with the typical extravagance of having two of them. It’s not about which half of the political front of the bourgeoisie is to blame for x and y, it’s capital doing its things and crumbling under its own contradictions

What’s the Tom Cruise equivalent of Graduation?

Yeah that makes me cringe too, it’s more of an ignorant thing than a deliberate choice nowdays but still, shows unserioisness at best

It’s the story of a pig, and he’s got really big balls, so much so that when he poops, he’s popping on his big, massive balls, and then he’s got poop all over is big, massive, enormous balls.

In France we put on transparent ones on books so they’re protected. Idk if buger kids have to pay for books, but ours are lent for the year and passed to the next generation so it’s important to keep them in a good state as long as possible

Idc sequels not cannon

Erectile dysfunction

C****le Cock