Atkinson Hyperlegible Font - Braille Institute
www.brailleinstitute.org
Read easier with Atkinson Hyperlegible Font, crafted for low-vision readers. Download for free and enjoy clear letters and numbers on your computer!

Note that there still have been no studies on its efficacy. At worst, it is a great font to avoid ambiguity between characters.

    • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
      4·
      9 hours ago

      I find this harder to read than almost any other “normal” font. I wonder if I have some other reading impairment I’ve never been aware of - having recently discovered I’m also not neurotypical

      • Don Antonio Magino@feddit.nl
        2·
        4 hours ago

        To be honest, studies around whether this font is actually easier to read for people with dyslexia haven’t shown that to be the case. At least, that’s what I remember from reading about it in a Dutch skeptic magazine (Skepter) some time ago. So if you have dyslexia and find this font harder to read, that doesn’t have to say anything about you.

        EDIT: this seems to be the article I read, though it’s from ten years ago.

    • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldEnglish
      18·
      18 hours ago

      I find it ironic that their website has extremely low contrasting colors making it very hard to read.

      (Look at the top left for the worst example)

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      101·
      20 hours ago

      I actually changed my Anki to OpenDyslexic a couple of months ago! I changed it again when Atkinson Hyperlegible Next came out, but I agree that OpenDyslexic makes reading a breeze.

      My only grievance with OpenDyslexic is that I don’t think I could send reports with this font without pushback. On the other hand, I have sent multiple reports using Atkinson Hyperlegible and nobody has ever said a thing.

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.netEnglish
      21·
      24 hours ago

      I wish there was an open font that tries to do the same thing, but with an aesthetic that wasn’t reminiscent of comic sans.

          • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
            2·
            4 hours ago

            Well yes but beauty standards for typography run counter to accommodating for dyslexia, especially for sans serifs. Similarity in shapes, curves, weights, and stroke width are seen as beautiful, but they’re exactly what must be given up for more accessible typography.

            Someone else in the comments here did mention Bionic Reading though, and there’s a free alternative in Fast Font, which has a gradient of weights for each word from black for the first letter to thin for the last one. Might be something to consider

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.netEnglish
          1·
          4 hours ago

          I like how that font disambiguates glyphs that often get confused, but I found it to be pretty hard to look at, honestly. I think the main issue might be that the line thickness appears to be uniform at all parts in all letters.

    • Flagstaff@programming.devEnglish
      2·
      20 hours ago

      I wonder how it works. Maybe it has to do with the intentional varying of the sizes of holes in letters, and the lopsided lines so one can’t be confused as another.

      • cynar@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6·
        14 hours ago

        While dyslexia is actually a cluster of related issues, a common one seems to be with dimensionality. Basically, the reader’s brain assumes the objects are 3 dimensional. When the eyes make micro adjustments, the letters don’t rotate, since they are 2D. The brain misinterprets this as them rotating, or moving. This is perceived as them flickering or moving, in the corner of your eye.

        There are several ways to break this effect. I suspect the shape is intended to mess with and slightly overload the depth sense. Strong colours can also disrupt it. E.g. via a coloured filter or glasses.

        Just to note, my knowledge/research on this was 20 years ago, so might be outdated now. The coloured filters (actually tinted reading glasses) did help a relative overcome dyslexia however.